ARTICLE

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLT IN THE ESL CONTEXT OF PAKISTAN

08 Pages : 85-111

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2016(I-I).08      10.31703/glr.2016(I-I).08      Published : Mar 2016

The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan

    The study investigates the effectiveness of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Public sector colleges of Pakistan. The experimental study traces improvement in comprehension and writing skills of intermediate level students (studying in grades 11 and 12). An experiment group and a control group are used to study the effects of CLT on learners’ progress. A pre-test and post-test are carried out to measure any improvement in the students’ cognitive learning process. The experiment group is given treatment through vigorous intervention of CLT based activities. The control group is taught through the traditional method of GTM. The data collected from the two groups are analyzed using SPSS. The results show a significant improvement in the learning process, comprehension and writing skills of the students in the experiment group. The analysis proves the appropriateness of CLT for Pakistani ESL context.

    CLT, Experimental Design, ESL, GMT, Intermediate Level Learners, Pakistani Context.
    (1) Arshad Ali Khan
    Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, UMT Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Hussain Ahmad
    Lecturer, English Language Institute, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
    (3) Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah
    Assistant Professor, Faculty for Languages and Translation, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
  • Ahmed, S., & Rao, C. (2013). Applying Communicative Approach in teaching English as a Foreign Language: A Case study of Pakistan. Porta Linguarum, 187-203. Retrieved November 2016
  • Ahn, H. (2012) Teaching Writing Skills Based on a Genre Approach to L2 Primary School Students: An Action Research. Canadian Centre of Science and Education. 5(2), 2-16. Retrieved From http:// dx. doi. org/ 10.5539/elt.v5n2p2
  • Atkinson, D. (2003). L2 Writing in the Post-Process Era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 3-15. Retrieved from http://www.people.iup.edu/pftl/classworks/Atkinson.pdf
  • Beretta, A., & Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore Project. ELT Journal, 39(2), 121-129. Retrieved August 6, 2016
  • Canale, M., & Swaine , M. (1980). Theoretical bases of Communicative Approaches to Secong Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. Retrieved October 26, 2016
  • Cheng, F. W. (2008). Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Writing: A Genre Approach to Teaching Narrative Writing. Asian EFL Journal, 10(2). Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/June_08_fwc.php
  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1989). Narrative and story in practice and research.
  • Ellis, G. (1996). How Culturally Appropriate is the Communicative Approach? ELT Journal, 50(3), 213-218. Retrieved October 26, 2016
  • Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity Revisited: how far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes. 21, 385-395. Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/locate/esp
  • Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060- 3743 (02)00124-8
  • Hyland, K. (2007). Genre Pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148-164. Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.edu/kej1 /APLNG_493/old_site/Hyland_2003.pdf
  • Lee, M. W. (2014). Will Ccommunicative Language Teaching work? Teachers' Perceptions towards the new Educational reform in South Korea. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 1-17. Retrieved August 9, 2016
  • Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative Language Teaching: State of the Art. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 261 - 279. Retrieved August 1, 2016, from http://www.jstor.org/journals/tesol.html.
  • Sun, G., & Cheng, L. (2002). From Context to Curriculum: A Case Study of Communicative Langage teaching in China. TESL Canada Journal, 19(2). Retrieved August 10, 2016
  • Swain, M. (1988). Manupilating and Complementing Content Teaching to Maximize Second Language Learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6(1), 68- 84. Retrieved July 10, 2016
  • Temple, C. A., & Gillet, J. W. (1989). Language Arts: Learning Processes and Training Practics. Pearson Scott Foresman.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Khan, Arshad Ali, Hussain Ahmad, and Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah. 2016. "The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan." Global Language Review, I (I): 85-111 doi: 10.31703/glr.2016(I-I).08
    HARVARD : KHAN, A. A., AHMAD, H. & SHAH, S. R. A. 2016. The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan. Global Language Review, I, 85-111.
    MHRA : Khan, Arshad Ali, Hussain Ahmad, and Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah. 2016. "The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan." Global Language Review, I: 85-111
    MLA : Khan, Arshad Ali, Hussain Ahmad, and Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah. "The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan." Global Language Review, I.I (2016): 85-111 Print.
    OXFORD : Khan, Arshad Ali, Ahmad, Hussain, and Shah, Sayyed Rashid Ali (2016), "The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan", Global Language Review, I (I), 85-111
    TURABIAN : Khan, Arshad Ali, Hussain Ahmad, and Sayyed Rashid Ali Shah. "The Effectiveness of CLT in the ESL Context of Pakistan." Global Language Review I, no. I (2016): 85-111. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2016(I-I).08