PHONOLOGY MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX INTERFACES IN PAKISTANI LANGUAGES

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2019(IV-I).05      10.31703/glr.2019(IV-I).05      Published : Mar 2019
Authored by : UmaimaKamran , SamraSaghir

05 Pages : 35-45

References

  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. Cambridge: MIT Press Cambridge.
  • Dobrovolsky, M., Katamba, F.; O' Grady. W. (1996). Interfaces. In Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction (pp. 245- 267). London & New York: Longman.
  • Embick, D., &, Noyer, R. (2005). Distributed Morphology and Syntax-morphology Interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hares, W.P. (2001). An English-Punjabi Dictionary. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications.
  • Hudson, R. A. (1996). Sociolinguistics. (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Inkelas, S. (1997). The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: a case study of dominance effects. In G. Booij and J.V. Marle (Eds.). Yearbook of Morphology (pp. 121-155). Netherlands: Springer Science Business Media
  • Inkelas, S., & Zec, D. (1990). The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  • Kiparsky, P. (1982a). From Cyclic to Lexical Phonology. In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (Eds.). The Structure of Phonological Representations, part I. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Kiparsky, P. (1982b). The Lexical Phonology of Vedic Accent. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
  • McCarthy, J; Prince, A. (1995). Prosodic morphology. In John Goldsmith (Ed.). The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Mughal, S. (2010). Shaukat-ul-Lughaat. Multan: Seraiki Adbi Board.
  • Punjabi language. (2015). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from
  • Ralli, A. & Stavrou, M. (1997). Morphology-syntax Interface: A-N compounds vs. A-N constructs in Modern Greek. In G. Booij and J.V. Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology (pp. 243-264). Netherlands: Springer Science Business Media.
  • Schutze, C.T. (1994). Serbo-Croatian Second Position Clitic Placement and the Phonology-Syntax Interface. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, (pp. 373-473).
  • Shackle, C. (1976). The Siraiki Language of Central Pakistan: A reference Grammar. London: Unwin Brothers Limited.
  • Shackle, C. (2003). Punjabi. In Cardona, G. and Jain, D. (Eds.). The Indo- Aryan Languages (pp. 581- 621). London: Routledge
  • Siraiki language. (2015). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from
  • Stiebels, B. (1997). Complex denominal verbs in German and the morphology-semantics interface. In Booij, G. and Marle, J.V. (Eds.). Yearbook of Morphology (pp. 265-302). Netherlands: Springer Science Business Media.
  • Urdu language. (2015). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from
  • Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Kamran, Umaima, and Samra Saghir. 2019. "Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax Interfaces in Pakistani Languages." Global Language Review, IV (I): 35-45 doi: 10.31703/glr.2019(IV-I).05
    HARVARD : KAMRAN, U. & SAGHIR, S. 2019. Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax Interfaces in Pakistani Languages. Global Language Review, IV, 35-45.
    MHRA : Kamran, Umaima, and Samra Saghir. 2019. "Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax Interfaces in Pakistani Languages." Global Language Review, IV: 35-45
    MLA : Kamran, Umaima, and Samra Saghir. "Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax Interfaces in Pakistani Languages." Global Language Review, IV.I (2019): 35-45 Print.
    OXFORD : Kamran, Umaima and Saghir, Samra (2019), "Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax Interfaces in Pakistani Languages", Global Language Review, IV (I), 35-45