References

• Achebe, C. (1994). Things fall apart. New York: Random House, Inc.
• Alekseyenko, N. V. (2013). A corpus-based study of theme and thematic progression in English and Russian non-translated texts and in Russian translated texts. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Kent State University.
• Boxwell, M. (1995). Nothing makes sense in Weir: A case of extensive ellipsis in nominals in a Papuan language. In R. Hasan, & P. H. Fries (Eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 123–151.
• Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
• Hasan, R. (2009). Wanted: A theory for integrated sociolinguistics. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), The collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan vol 2: Semantic variation – meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, London and Oakville, CT: Equinox, 5-40
• Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, A. S. (1980). Transitivity in the grammar of discourse. Language 56(2), 251–299.
• Jalilifar, A. (2009). Thematic development in English and translated academic texts. Journal of Language & Translation 10(1), 81-111.
• Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). Descriptive motifs and generalisations. In A. Caffarel, J. R. Martin & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (Eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective, Benjamins: Amsterdam, 537–674
• Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. et al. (2008). Multilingual studies as a multidimensional space of interconnected language studies. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Meaning in context: Strategies for implementing intelligent applications of language studies, London: Continuum, 146–220
• Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. et al. (2016). The typology of verbal units within the overall systems of languages. A Colloquium in the 43rd International Systemic Functional Linguistics Congress [ISFLC] Bandung. July, 19-27.
• McCabe, A. M. (1999). Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history texts. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Aston University, England.
• Mock, C. C. (1969). The grammatical units of the Nzema language: A systemic analysis. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of London, London.
• Ochi, A., & Lam, M. (2010). A systemic functional study of particles in Japanese and Cantonese: An initial exploration. JASFL Proceedings, 4, 41–59.
• O'Donnell, M. (2008). Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session (Companion Volume), Association for Computational Linguistics, 13-16.
• Rørvik, S. (2003). Thematic progression in translation from English into Norwegian. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 2(2), 245–264.
• Schmidt, R. L. (1999). Urdu: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.
• Sutjaja, I. G. M. (1988). The nominal group in Bahasa Indonesia. Sydney: PhD Dissertation, University of Sydney.
• Teruya, K. et al. (2007). Typology of mood: A text-based and system-based functional view. In R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen & J. J. Webster (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective 2, 859–920, London: Equinox Publishing.
• Teruya, K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2015). Halliday in relation to language comparison and typology. In J. J. Webster (Ed.). The Bloomsbury companion to Halliday, M. A. K. London: Bloomsbury, 427-452.
• Ullah, I. (1991). Bikharti Duniya. Lahore: Nigarshat Publications.
• Wang, Y., & Xu, J. (2013). A systemic typology of existential and possessive constructions. Functions of Language, 205(1), 1–30.