References

• Ali, T. (2000). The Stone Woman. London: Verso.
• Baxter, J. (2003). Positioning gender in discourse. London: Palgrave.
• Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: CUP.
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of 'sex'. New York: Routledge.
• Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (1995). Man in the news: The misrepresentation of women speaking in news-as narrative discourse. In S. Mills (Ed.), Language and gender: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 226- 239). New York: Longman
• Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Ehrlich, S. (2001). Representing rape: Language and sexual consent. New York: Routledge.
• Fairclough, N (1992). 'Discourse, Social theory and social research: The discourse of welfare reform ' in Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4: (2): 163-195.
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Arnold.
• Fairclough, N. (1999). 'Democracy and the public sphere in critical research on discourse' in Wodak, R. & Ludwig, C. (Eds.) Challenges in a changing world: issues in Critical Discourse Analysis. Vienna: Passagen Verlag 63-85.
• Flax, J. (1990). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 39-62). New York: Routledge.
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
• Grant, J. (1993). Fundamental feminism: Contesting the core concepts of feminist theory. New York: Routledge
• Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Hall, K., & Bucholtz, M. (Eds.). (1995). Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. New York: Routledge.
• Hill-Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.
• Kennedy, E. L. (2008). Socialist Feminism: What Difference Did It Make to the History of Women's Studies? Feminist Studies, 34(3), 497-525,621-622.
• Kress, G. (1990). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 84-99.
• Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners (Third edition ed.). London: Sage Publications Inc
• Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141-164. DOI: 10.1080/17405900701464816
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (Third Edition ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
• Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc
• Remlinger, K. (2005). Negotiating the classroom floor: Negotiating ideologies of gender and sexuality. In M. M. Lazar (Ed.), Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse (pp. 114-138). London: Palgrave
• Stewart, M. (Ed.). (2004). Pregnancy, Birth and Maternity Care. Edinburgh: Elsevier Science Limited
• Swann, J. (1988). Gender inequalities in classroom talk. English in Education, 22, 48-65.
• Talbot, M. M. (1998). Language and gender: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
• Travers, M. (1991). Qualitative Research Through Case Studies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Walsh, C. (2001). Gender and discourse: Language and power in politics, the church and organizations. London: Pearson Education.
• Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell
• West, C. (1990). Not just doctor's orders: Directive-response sequences in patients' visits to women and men physicians. Discourse and Society, 1, 85-112.
• Widdowson, H.G. (1995). 'On the limitations of linguistics applied' in Applied Linguistics, 21: (1): 3 25.
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (1995). Introduction. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives (pp. 1-9). London: Sage
• Wodak, R. (1997).'The semiotics of racism: A Critical Discourse-Historical Analysis' in Renkema, J.(Ed.) Discourse, of course: an overview of research in discourse studies. Amsterdam;Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co. 311-326.
• Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2005). 'Critical Discourse Analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology' in Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (Eds.) Methods of critical discourse analysis. 2nd ed. London: SAGE 1-33.
• Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigh, M., et al. (2010). The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.