References
- Abrams, M. H. (1971). Shelley's
- Behrendt, S. (1989). Shelley and his audience. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
- Cameron, K. N. (1945). Shelley and the reformers. The Johns Hopkins University Press. (pp. 62-85) Retrieved on April 24, 2017 from
- Cartwright, F. D. (1826). The life and correspondence of Major Cartwright. London: H. Colburn.
- Crook, N. & Guiton, D. (1986). Shelley's Venomed Malady. New York: Cambridge UP.
- Dowden (1888). Last words on Shelley. London: Kegan Paul.
- Ferber, F. (1993). The poetry of Shelley. London: Penguin.
- Jager, C. (2014). Shelley after atheism. Studies in Romanticism, 49 (4), 611-631.
- Ingpen, R. & Peck, W. E. (1826). An address to Irish people. The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Julian Edition. London: Ernest Benn.
- Judson, B. (2006). Under the influence: Owenson, Shelley, and the religion of dreams Modern Philology, 104 (2). The University of Chicago. Retrieved on April 24, 2017, from
- McNiece, M. (1969). Shelley and the revolutionary idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Morton, T. (1994). Shelley and the revolution in taste. New York: Cambridge UP.
- Neil, F. (1989). Illegitimate Shelley: Radical piracy and the textual edition as cultural performance, PMLA, 409- 423.
- Reiman, D. H. & Fraistat, N. F. (2002). Poetry and prose: Authoritative texts, criticism. New York: Norton.
- Shelley, P. B. (1812). The Mask of Anarchy. London: Edward Moxon.
- Shelley, P. B. (1813, 1993). The necessity of atheism and other essays. New York: Prometheus Books.
- Shelley, P. B. (1820). Philosophical view of reform. In R. J. White (Ed.). Political Tracts of Wordsworth, Coleridge and Shelley (pp. 207-262). Cambridge: The University Press.
- Shelley, P. B. (1964). The Letters of Percy Byshhe Shelley, Vols. 1& 2. Frederick L. Jones (Ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Simpson, M. (1998). Closest performance: political and exhibition and prohibition in the dramas of Byron and Shelley. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Tetrault, R. (1987). The poetry of life: Shelley and literary form. Toronto: University of Toronto.
- Veitch, G. S. (1965). The genesis of parliamentary reform. London: Constable.
Cite this article
-
APA : Aryan, A. A., Iqbal, L., & Nawab, R. (2020). Moral and Political System as Objects of Aesthetic Beauty and the Case of Shelly. Global Language Review, V(II), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-II).08
-
CHICAGO : Aryan, Ayaz Ahmad, Liaqat Iqbal, and Rafiq Nawab. 2020. "Moral and Political System as Objects of Aesthetic Beauty and the Case of Shelly." Global Language Review, V (II): 72-82 doi: 10.31703/glr.2020(V-II).08
-
HARVARD : ARYAN, A. A., IQBAL, L. & NAWAB, R. 2020. Moral and Political System as Objects of Aesthetic Beauty and the Case of Shelly. Global Language Review, V, 72-82.
-
MHRA : Aryan, Ayaz Ahmad, Liaqat Iqbal, and Rafiq Nawab. 2020. "Moral and Political System as Objects of Aesthetic Beauty and the Case of Shelly." Global Language Review, V: 72-82
-
MLA : Aryan, Ayaz Ahmad, Liaqat Iqbal, and Rafiq Nawab. "Moral and Political System as Objects of Aesthetic Beauty and the Case of Shelly." Global Language Review, V.II (2020): 72-82 Print.
-
OXFORD : Aryan, Ayaz Ahmad, Iqbal, Liaqat, and Nawab, Rafiq (2020), "Moral and Political System as Objects of Aesthetic Beauty and the Case of Shelly", Global Language Review, V (II), 72-82
-
TURABIAN : Aryan, Ayaz Ahmad, Liaqat Iqbal, and Rafiq Nawab. "Moral and Political System as Objects of Aesthetic Beauty and the Case of Shelly." Global Language Review V, no. II (2020): 72-82. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-II).08