<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">53</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="short-title">glr</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.31703/glr</journal-id>
  <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Global Language Review</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">glr</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group>
  <issn publication-format="print">2663-3299</issn>
  <issn publication-format="electronic">2663-3841</issn>
  <self-uri xlink:href="https://glrjournal.com"/>
  <publisher>
    <publisher-name>Humanity Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Pakistan</publisher-loc>
  </publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
  <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">391816</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31703/glr.2016(I-I).06</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="other" specific-use="submission-id">2285</article-id>
  <article-version article-version-type="publisher">1.0</article-version>
  <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
      <subject>article</subject>
    </subj-group>
  </article-categories>
  <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">Problem of Learning Contents through English at BS Level: A Case Study of Agriculture University Peshawar</article-title>
  </title-group>
<contrib-group>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="1" corresp="yes">
    <name>
      <surname>Ahmad</surname>
      <given-names>Naseer</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="2">
    <name>
      <surname>Nisar</surname>
      <given-names>Henna Gul</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="3">
    <name>
      <surname>Munir</surname>
      <given-names>Namra</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
  </contrib>
  <aff id="aff1">
    <label>1</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>IBMS, The Univeristy of Agriculture, Peshawar</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Lecturer</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff2">
    <label>2</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>IBMS, The Univeristy of Agriculture, Peshawar</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Lecturer</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff3">
    <label>3</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of Education, University of Lahore, Lahore</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>Punjab</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
  <corresp id="cor1">Corresponding Author: Naseer Ahmad, Lecturer IBMS, The Univeristy of Agriculture, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.. Contact: 1</corresp>
<fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="fn-coi">
  <p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="ethics-statement" id="fn-ethics">
  <p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="data-availability-statement" id="fn-data">
  <p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
  <day>31</day>
  <month>03</month>
  <year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
  <month>03</month>
  <year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print">
  <day>26</day>
  <month>05</month>
  <year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
  <volume>1</volume>
  <issue>1</issue>
  <season>Winter</season>
  <fpage>66</fpage>
  <lpage>73</lpage>
  <history>
    <date date-type="received">
      <day>30</day>
      <month>12</month>
      <year>2016</year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="accepted">
      <day>26</day>
      <month>05</month>
      <year>2022</year>
    </date>
  </history>
<funding-group>
  <funding-statement>
<p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p>
  </funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<permissions>
  <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
  <copyright-holder>Humanity Publications</copyright-holder>
  <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="en" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
  </license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="https://glrjournal.com/article/Problem-of-Learning-Contents-through-English-at-BS-Level:-A-Case-Study-of-Agriculture-University-Peshawar"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://glrjournal.com/pdf/glr/0wubcnCK8r.pdf"/>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://glrjournal.com/pdf/glr/0wubcnCK8r.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  <abstract>
    <p>The present research relates English language teaching (ELT) effects on learning contents at the BS level in our province. It shows that the contents in syllabus teaching affect communicative ability of the students. It also explains the teachersâÂ€Â™ effective delivery of the required knowledge to the learners. The survey method was adopted for this study. Agriculture University Peshawar, students were the population of the research. Data is collected through questionnaire.</p>
  </abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
  <kwd>ELT</kwd>
  <kwd>Syllabus</kwd>
  <kwd>Ability</kwd>
  <kwd>Knowledge</kwd>
</kwd-group>
  <custom-meta-group>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>views</meta-name><meta-value>2273</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>downloads</meta-name><meta-value>32</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>html-views</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>google-scholar-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>crossref-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
  </custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1">
  <title>Introduction</title>
<p>English has become modern world need. It is the world language. English is spoken as a native, as a foreign or second language across the world. In powerful nations of the world like the United States, New Zealand, Australia, United kingdom, South Africa, Ireland, and in many other countries of the world, it is spoken as native language. Commonwealth countries such as India, Pakistan and Bangladesh use it as an official language, and it is also the language of education in schools, colleges and universities. People have learnt that learning of English is very important for their bright future. It is the language of world media, higher education and a source for an attractive job. English literature is also very important because it expose us to a variety of experiences. Due to the internet it has expanded its domain throughout the whole world. According to Crystal (1995) “most of the scientific technological and academic information in the world is expressed and communicated in English and over 80% of all the information is stored in electronic retrieval system is in English.”</p><p><break/></p><p>Research Question</p><p><break/></p><p>What are the problems faced by learners in English language teaching process at BS level?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2">
  <title>Literature Review</title>
<p>ELT does not produce the required result at the BS level in KPK. Books are not according to the needs of the learner’s communicative ability. Since the beginning of BS programmes in the Universities, there have been made no changes in the suggested books for English at BS level. Although the course is only theoretical and much focus is on grammar, still the authorities consider that at the end of the course the learner will be able to communicate in English properly. At intermediate level most of the time teachers are not trained or aware of modern teaching methodologies. While at BS level in the university, they are taught by trained teachers who are well qualified.</p><p>At BS level most of the time students are set free, and teachers do not interfere in their learning process, as the students are used to at intermediate level. They take guidelines which mostly do not fulfil their academic needs; students are at their own mercy. Thus they start cramming from different helping materials, easily available to them, which cannot provide them with authentic knowledge.</p><p>Communication is the basic aim of any teaching language, which requires command of four skills such as listening, reading, speaking and writing. Since lecture methods are used in the language classroom at this level, interaction is lacking which  is considered the most important factor  in language learning. Due to no interaction the learner always hears rather than speaks and thus his communicative ability remains undeveloped.</p><p>Three different variables are observed regarding ELT. Some colleges focus on English language, some use the Urdu language and ignore English language, while there is another most crucial set up which use regional languages as a medium of instruction in their teaching.  in such schools English is willingly ignored or given less importance in getting theintermediate certificate. These three categories of institutions provide learners for the BS level. As they are from different backgrounds and medium of instructions,their problems also vary at BS level.</p><p>At BS level, different factors are observed related to ELT. The first and most important factor is syllabus which includes course contents, the second role is of the teacher who functions as a guide,the third is the institution or place of reading, the fourth is information about the learner and last but not the least is the exam, to know about learner ability. All these dimensions need a smooth combination or balance to produce good or successful learners of the language after BS level.</p><p><break/></p><p>Learning of Language</p><p><break/></p><p>Human beings communicate with one another by using written or oral language. Language is a system of arbitrary vocal symbols which enable human beings to have interaction with one another in a society. According to Chomsky (1988) “the learning of a language is an exclusive faculty of human beings and does not exist in any other species, although animals like monkeys, dolphins and some other can communicate through language, but they cannot use language as creatively as human beings. They can communicate only in a fixed way through the help of certain specific signals .The language faculty appears to be a property common to the species and unique to it in its essentials.” However, Krashen and Tervell (1988) state “language acquisition can only take place when a message which is being transmitted, is understood i.e. when the focus is on the form of the message.” It is clarified that only the use of language, not only rules, is the best way to learn a language.</p><p><break/></p><p>Learning of English as a Second Language</p><p><break/></p><p>A second language is acquired or learnt, when one become mature or reaches adulthood. Extra efforts are needed to become a competent speaker of the second or target language or foreign language. In Lado’s (1964) words:</p><p>“Learning a second language is more than learning a description of it, it involves imitating, practicing, memorization,listening,interpreting,reading,writing and speaking etc”.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3">
  <title>Methodology (Data Collection and Analysis)</title>
<p>It is empirical research. BS level
students studying BS (CS) is the population of this research, in order to get
first hand data a questionnaire is made related to the course contents at BS
level and related to the methodology used by the teachers in English language
teaching, the way they teach mean his teaching style and its effects on learner
communicative skills development. Numerical values were used for collected
responses of the research population.</p><p>Participant data is presented as:</p><p><bold>Table 1. Causes of
Listening Difficulty</bold></p><table-wrap id="table1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><title>Table 1</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> <p><bold>Causes</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Disagree</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Strange sound system of the speaker</p> </td><td> <p>80%</p> </td><td> <p>20%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Difficult grammar structure</p> </td><td> <p>75%</p> </td><td> <p>25%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Strange stress</p> </td><td> <p>60%</p> </td><td> <p>40%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Fast speaking speed</p> </td><td> <p>72%</p> </td><td> <p>28%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Broken sentences</p> </td><td> <p>64%</p> </td><td> <p>36%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Lack of vocabulary</p> </td><td> <p>78%</p> </td><td> <p>22%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Use of slang language</p> </td><td> <p>81%</p> </td><td> <p>19%</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><italic>N: 100</italic></p><p>In response to listening difficulty 80%
learners conformed that the strange sound system of the speaker enhanced
difficulty in listening impairment while 20% learners disagreed. 75% of the
learners responded that different grammar structures also hinder their
listening skill while 25% were against the view. 60% learners were in favour
while 40% were against the view that a strange stress pattern is also the cause
of listening difficulty. 72% of the learners viewed that the speed of speaking
also hinders their listening ability, whereas 28% were against this idea. 36%
against 64% of the population noted that broken sentences also result in
listening difficulty. 78% viewed that lack of vocabulary contributes a great
deal to their listening problem while 22% of them were against this view. 81%
of the learners thought the use of slang and colloquial language in real life
situation is the major cause of their listening difficulty whereas 19% consider
it otherwise.</p><p><bold>Table 2. Causes of
Reading Difficulty</bold></p><table-wrap id="table2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><title>Table 2</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> <p><bold>Causes</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Disagree</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Loud reading</p> </td><td> <p>81%</p> </td><td> <p>19%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Slow movement of eyes on the text</p> </td><td> <p>75%</p> </td><td> <p>25%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Feeling hesitation in the class</p> </td><td> <p>66%</p> </td><td> <p>34%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Habit of reading slowly</p> </td><td> <p>72%</p> </td><td> <p>28%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Lack of vocabulary</p> </td><td> <p>69%</p> </td><td> <p>31%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Lengthy sentences</p> </td><td> <p>58%</p> </td><td> <p>42%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Lack of grammatical knowledge</p> </td><td> <p>70%</p> </td><td> <p>30%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Placing finger or pencil on the text</p> </td><td> <p>75%</p> </td><td> <p>25%</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>N: 100</p><p>In response to the first question 81% of
the learners viewed that loud reading contributes to reading problems while the
remaining 19% portion of the population opposed it. 75% learners agreed that
slow movement of the eyes also hinders their reading ability while 25% were
against it. 66% of the learner population mentioned that they felt hesitation
while reading in the class whereas 34% disagreed. 72% of learners thought that a
slow reading habit also contributes to reading impairment while 28% viewed it
otherwise. 69% of the learners forwarded their idea that lack of vocabulary
also makes it difficult for them to read whereas 31% of learner were against
this idea. 58% learners thought that lengthy sentences also contribute to
reading comprehension problems while 42% opposed it. 70% assumed that lack of
grammatical rules also adds to reading impairment while 30% were against this
view. 75% supposed that placing of pencil or finger is also the contributory
factor in reading comprehension problem whereas 25% were against this idea.</p><p><bold>Table 3. Causes of
speaking difficulty</bold></p><table-wrap id="table3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><title>Table 3</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> <p><bold>Causes</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Disagree</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Feeling of hesitation</p> </td><td> <p>68%</p> </td><td> <p>32%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Feeling that other will laugh at me</p> </td><td> <p>60%</p> </td><td> <p>40%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Lack of knowledge of grammatical rules</p> </td><td> <p>72%</p> </td><td> <p>28%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Lack of vocabulary</p> </td><td> <p>60%</p> </td><td> <p>40%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Slow translation process from mother
  tongue to English</p> </td><td> <p>63%</p> </td><td> <p>37%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Lack of confidence</p> </td><td> <p>72%</p> </td><td> <p>28%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Interference of mother tongue</p> </td><td> <p>77%</p> </td><td> <p>23%</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><italic>N: 100</italic></p><p>In response to the above questions in the table
68% learners responded that a feeling of hesitation stops them expressing
themselves while the same problem is not faced by 32% of the population. 60%
learners were in favour of this typical fact that if they speak in English
others will laugh at them thus it hinders their speaking ability while 40% of learners
were against this idea. 72% noted that lack of information of grammatical rules
also causes difficulty for them when they speak in English whereas 28% did not
face this problem. 60% confirmed that due to lack of vocabulary they are unable
to speak in English while 40% were against this very fact. 63% of learners were
in favour of this idea that due to slow thought process of translation from
mother tongue they cannot speak confidently or fluently while 37% rejected this
idea. 72% noted that due to lack of confidence they are never in a position to
utter a single word while 28% opposed the idea. 77% of learners noted that
interference of mother tongue also makes it difficult for them to speak in
English whereas 23% were against this idea.</p><p><bold>Table 4. Causes of
Writing Difficulty</bold></p><table-wrap id="table4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><title>Table 4</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> <p><bold>Causes</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Agree</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Disagree</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Lack of confidence</p> </td><td> <p>60%</p> </td><td> <p>40%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Lack of grammatical rules</p> </td><td> <p>62%</p> </td><td> <p>38%</p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="3" valign="bottom"> <p><italic>Table Continued on Next Page</italic></p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="3" valign="top"> <p><italic>Table Continued from Previous Page</italic></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Writing wrong sentences</p> </td><td> <p>58%</p> </td><td> <p>42%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Punctuation problem</p> </td><td> <p>55%</p> </td><td> <p>45%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Slow translation process from mother
  tongue</p> </td><td> <p>70%</p> </td><td> <p>30%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Lack of vocabulary</p> </td><td> <p>56%</p> </td><td> <p>44%</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Speaking while writing</p> </td><td> <p>75%</p> </td><td> <p>25%</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><italic>N:   100</italic></p><p>60% learners responded that due to lack of
confidence they are unable to write whereas 40% considered it otherwise. 62%
confirmed that the lack of grammatical rules contributes a lot to their writing
problem while 38% percent opposed the idea. Due to wrong sentence writing 58%
learners agreed that they cannot write and the rest 42% disagreed. Lack of
punctuation knowledge also makes it difficult for 55% of learners to write
while 45% were against it. 70% of the learners were of the opinion that slow
translation process is the reason of their writing deficiency and 30% consider
it otherwise. 56% of learners believed that due to the lack of relevant
vocabulary they cannot write appropriately whereas 44% considered it the opposite.75%
of the learners were against this idea that due to speaking habits during
writing they are unable to write or it make it difficult for them while 25%
considered it the opposite.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-4">
  <title>Findings</title>
<p>1.	The learners believed that due to the lack of native accent exposure, the facility  of their listening skills remained underdeveloped. The learner spent much of his time in the home and local society and so there is no use of English .The only source of listening to English was their teachers.</p><p>2.	The desired or required level of reading skill was not achieved by the learners according to their response. They felt shy due to weak punctuation.</p><p>3.	Most of the learners were not creative in their response to write on new topics due to undeveloped creative writing skills.</p><p>4.  A majority of the learners considered it the fact that due to the feeling of hesitation they were unable to read in the classroom.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5">
  <title>Recommendations</title>
<p>1.	While designing syllabus the four communicative skills should be given equal importance at BS level.</p><p>2.	Native speaking speed hinders listening comprehension of the learners as translation process from English to mother tongue or from mother tongue to English is very slow. It could be overcome by suggesting English documentaries, related movies, English songs and the provision ofmore practical opportunities to directly communicate with natives by using technology.</p><p>3.	Student should be informed not to use finger, pencil or pen on the text in order to improve their reading.</p><p>4.	Classroom discussion should be made a two way traffic which means thatstudent oriented rather than teacher oriented modern techniques should be applied to invite student participation in the classroom.</p><p>5.	Students ideas and suggestion should be appreciated and welcomed.</p><p>6.	the use of English outside and inside the classroom should be made compulsory.</p><p>7.	Pronounciation mistakes should be corrected very politely and learners should be informed that being non-native speakers there would be pronunciation mistakes.</p><p>8.	While speaking or writing talking bad habits should be curbed because they effects both oral and written communication.</p><p>9.	As learners fear that they would commit errors, they remain silent or do not contribute in orals and written communication. This problem should be curbed by giving them more opportunities to use the four skills in the classroom.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group content-type="conflict-of-interest">
  <title>Conflict of Interest</title>
  <fn fn-type="conflict">
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="ethics-statement">
  <title>Ethics Statement</title>
  <fn fn-type="ethics">
<p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="data-availability">
  <title>Data Availability</title>
  <fn fn-type="data-availability-statement">
<p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<app-group>
  <app id="app-suppl">
    <title>Supplementary Materials</title>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://glrjournal.com/pdf/glr/0wubcnCK8r.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  </app>
</app-group>
<ref-list>
  <title>References</title>
<ref id="Chomsky">
  <label>1</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Chomsky, N</person-group>
    <year>1988</year>
    <article-title>. language and problem of knowledge</article-title>
    <source>Cambridge Mass.: MIT press. (pp.39)</source>
    <page-range>roblem</page-range>
    Chomsky, N. (1988). language and problem of knowledge. Cambridge Mass.: MIT press. (pp.39).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Crystal">
  <label>2</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Crystal,D</person-group>
    <year>1995</year>
    <article-title>.The Cambridge encyclopaedia of language</article-title>
    <source>Cambridge: Cambridge university press. (pp.106)</source>
    <page-range>ress</page-range>
    Crystal,D. (1995).The Cambridge encyclopaedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. (pp.106).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Kachru">
  <label>3</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Kachru, B. B</person-group>
    <year>1968</year>
    <article-title>.The alchemy of English</article-title>
    <source>The spread, function and modals of non_native.Oxford Pergamon Press Ltd.(pp.11</source>
    <page-range>ergamon</page-range>
    Kachru, B. B. (1968).The alchemy of English. The spread, function and modals of non_native.Oxford Pergamon Press Ltd.(pp.11,14,68).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Kreshen">
  <label>4</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Kreshen, S.P. &amp; Terrell, T.D</person-group>
    <year>1988</year>
    <source>The natural approach language acquisition in the classroom.UK:PrenticeHallInternational</source>
    <page-range>renticeHallInternational</page-range>
    Kreshen, S.P. &amp; Terrell, T.D. (1988). The natural approach language acquisition in the classroom.UK:PrenticeHallInternational.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Lazar">
  <label>5</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Lazar, G</person-group>
    <year>1993</year>
    <source>Literatures and language teaching: aguide for teachers and trainers.Cambridge: Cambridge University press</source>
    <page-range>ress</page-range>
    Lazar, G. (1993). Literatures and language teaching: aguide for teachers and trainers.Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Mansoor">
  <label>6</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Mansoor , S</person-group>
    <year>1993</year>
    <article-title>. Panjabi, Urdu, English in Pkistan</article-title>
    <source>Lahore: Vanguard Books Pvt. Ltd</source>
    <page-range>anjabi</page-range>
    Mansoor , S (1993). Panjabi, Urdu, English in Pkistan. Lahore: Vanguard Books Pvt. Ltd.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>