<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">53</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="short-title">glr</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.31703/glr</journal-id>
  <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Global Language Review</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">glr</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group>
  <issn publication-format="print">2663-3299</issn>
  <issn publication-format="electronic">2663-3841</issn>
  <self-uri xlink:href="https://glrjournal.com"/>
  <publisher>
    <publisher-name>Humanity Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Pakistan</publisher-loc>
  </publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
  <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">391900</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31703/glr.2020(V-II).07</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="other" specific-use="submission-id">2369</article-id>
  <article-version article-version-type="publisher">1.0</article-version>
  <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
      <subject>article</subject>
    </subj-group>
  </article-categories>
  <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">A Comparative Study of Teachers&apos; and Head Teachers&apos; Perceptions about National Professional Standard for Teachers at Secondary School Level</article-title>
  </title-group>
<contrib-group>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="1" corresp="yes">
    <name>
      <surname>Altaf</surname>
      <given-names>Fasiha Altaf</given-names>
    </name>
    <email>fasihashah@hotmail.com</email>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="2">
    <name>
      <surname>Saeed</surname>
      <given-names>Muhammad Saeed</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="3">
    <name>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
  </contrib>
  <aff id="aff1">
    <label>1</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>PhD. Scholar, Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <addr-line>Punjab</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff2">
    <label>2</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>Punjab</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
  <corresp id="cor1">Corresponding Author: Fasiha Altaf, PhD. Scholar, Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.. Email: <email>fasihashah@hotmail.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="fn-coi">
  <p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="ethics-statement" id="fn-ethics">
  <p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="data-availability-statement" id="fn-data">
  <p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
  <day>30</day>
  <month>06</month>
  <year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
  <month>06</month>
  <year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print">
  <day>26</day>
  <month>05</month>
  <year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
  <volume>5</volume>
  <issue>2</issue>
  <season>Spring</season>
  <fpage>62</fpage>
  <lpage>71</lpage>
  <history>
    <date date-type="accepted">
      <day>26</day>
      <month>05</month>
      <year>2022</year>
    </date>
  </history>
<funding-group>
  <funding-statement>
<p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p>
  </funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<permissions>
  <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
  <copyright-holder>Humanity Publications</copyright-holder>
  <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="en" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
  </license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="https://glrjournal.com/article/a-comparative-study-of-teachers-and-head-teachers-perceptions-about-national-professional-standard-for-teachers-at-secondary-school-level"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://glrjournal.com/pdf/glr/zL6pxmHN2d.pdf"/>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://glrjournal.com/pdf/glr/zL6pxmHN2d.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  <abstract>
    <p>Pakistan is paying special attention to its educational system and training of the teachers to improve the quality of teaching as a profession. One of the most highlighted elements in this educational development is the quality teaching practices in terms of National Professional Standards for Teachers (NPST).Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques were applied to analyze the comparison between teachers and head-teachers&apos; perceptions of NPST. Through simple random sampling technique 30 head-teachers (15 males and 15 females) and 300 teachers (150 males and 150 females) were selected. Two questionnaires were developed to assess the teachers and head-teachers&apos; perceptions about NPSTs. The results revealed that comparatively female teachers who were more qualified and experienced were recently hired teachers who knew about National Professional Standards, were more enthusiastic about how to practice these standards in comparison to the teachers who had joined this profession in the late 80&apos;s and 90&apos;s.</p>
  </abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
  <kwd>NPST</kwd>
  <kwd>Teachers</kwd>
  <kwd>Head-Teachers</kwd>
  <kwd>Secondary Level</kwd>
</kwd-group>
  <custom-meta-group>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>views</meta-name><meta-value>1011</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>downloads</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>html-views</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>google-scholar-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>crossref-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
  </custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1">
  <title>Introduction</title>
<p>Education is the key factor and the integral variable which affirms the status of a nation or country as ethically sound and socially civilized in the world. Education offers us a profound understanding of how to enhance or improve a nation on academic and intellectual grounds. Teacher is the founding stone whom the entire process of education counts upon and he, along with the other managing academicians, is solely responsible for the entire process of nation building in the true sense of meaning (Minhas, 2012). The ever-increasing interest of the educational world has expected to be geared up for the professional development of teachers. The idea of engaging teachers has been changed throughout the world. An entirely new concept has been introduced for presenting teacher assessment and accreditation, framework to evaluate the individual and expert skills of the educators.</p><p>Several studies have been conducted during the previous two decades that are directly linked with teachers’ effectiveness to students’ learning skills and objectives  (Darling-Hammond, 2008). Educationists usually lay special emphasis on students’ sound knowledge, learning and intellectual development. They also consider continuous professional growth, collaborative learning and relationships as key characteristics. In addition, it is flattering more and more and obviously that is the impact of teacher’s excellence. Education could be observed upon student’s learning for the years to come even if not having a direct contact with an individual teacher (Mendro, 1998). For this reason, drastic measures have been taken up to guarantee optimum quality in teaching and learning.</p>National Professional Standard for Teachers in PakistanNational Professional Standards for Teachers in Pakistan, was launched by the Policy and Planning Wing, Ministry of Education, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, (2009) . The National Education Census (NEC) 2005 information and a number of research  demonstrates that professional planning of instructors in Pakistan is not one or the other standardized nor based on satisfactory proficient measures. The NEC information demonstrates that 26% of instructors within the workforce are untrained, 37% have as it were simply preparing at the PTC and CT levels, 44% have not completed indeed 12 years essential instruction. These constitute by any degree, slightest qualities instructors, detailed indeed a more terrible picture of proficient capabilities of instructors at the essential level, whereas it was 21% have completed B.Ed. and M.Ed. degrees. Pakistan  may be a creating nation of the world. On the off chance that Pakistan has a point to end up the developed country of the world, at that point Pakistan should reshape its instructive infrastructure. Pakistan should design such an infrastructure of instruction from kindergarten to postgraduate level that incorporates a profitable character. Quality instructing exercise and quality instructive framework is not conceivable without dedicated and qualified instructors from kindergarten to matriculation. The teachers  ought to have multi characteristics so that they can persuade learners to quality learning and educating. Quality learning can as it were be conceivable in the event that the instructors are genuine proficient and they are prepared to convey at any level.<break/>Standard 1: Subject Matter KnowledgeTeachers  should continuously be commonplace with the information of subject matter knowledge. Educator ought to continuously plan such exercises for all the learners who are concurring to the educational modules or standard of the substance information. (Peters, 1981) stated that In the event that anything is to be respected as particular planning for instructing learners, the need must be given to an intensive establishing in something to instruct. That subject matter  knowledge is a basic component of instructor information is not one or the other an  unused  nor a Questionable explanation. After all, in case educating learners involves making a difference others learn, at that point understanding what is to be instructed may be a central necessity of instructing. The endless assignments of instructing, such as selecting beneficial learning exercises, providing supportive clarifications, inquiring beneficial questions, and assessing learners skills, all depend on the educator&apos;s understanding of what it is that learners have to memorize and understand. According to Buchmann (1984), it would be odd to anticipate an instructor to arrange a lesson on, for the occasion, composing reports in science and to assess related learner assignments, in case that educator is uninformed around composing around almost science, and does not get it what learner advance in composing science reports might mean (p. 32). Helping learners learn subject matter includes more than the conveyance of realities and data. The objective of educating learners is to help learners in creating mental assets to empower them to take part in, not only to know around, the major spaces of human thought . These incorporate the past and its connection to the present; the real world; the thoughts, reliance, and values of our possess and other people groups; the measurements of space and amount; representation and aesthetics; and so on. Understanding involves being able to utilize mental thoughts and abilities as devices to pick up control over each day, real-world issues. Learners ought to see themselves, either alone or in participation with others, as able to figure out things of utilizing mathematics  to characterize and reason through an issue; of following down the roots of the current social approach; of translating a lyric or story, of understanding how physical powers work; of reproducing in composing a feeling, thought, or encounter. They ought to both be able and slanted to challenge the claims in a politician&apos;s discourse, to form a sense of and criticize introductions of measurable data, and to compose a viable letter to the editor. A conceptual dominance of subject matter and the capacity to be basic of information itself can enable learners to be viable artists in their environment.<break/>Standard 2: Human Growth and DevelopmentHuman growth and development is an exceptionally vital perspective of instructor proficient improvement. The information and application of human development and advancement in classroom instruction makes viable teaching. It is exceptionally imperative to gotten to be a competent instructor that one ought to know the components influencing on learner&apos;s execution, the assorted fashion of learning, and different ways of getting information and have the esteem to treat learners similarly. Educators ought to get it how youth and children create and  learn  in an assortment of school, family, and community settings and give openings that bolster passionate, physical, social, and passionate improvement (Government of Pakistan, 2009).<break/>Standard 3: Instructional Planning and StrategiesTeachers  must have the cutting edge information of instructing strategies, methods, and audio-visual help so that instructors can plan such exercises for the learners which can enhance issue tackling and basic considering within the learners. Instructional planning may be a professional ability of the educator to see and foresee into long term learning the why and how of the educating learning strategy as stated by (Zulueta, 2006). Guidelines  are ought to be continuously considered  not as it were on the course but moreover on the requirements of the students. Another thing must be kept into consideration that all abilities of the learners are diverse and all instructional planning must be done accordingly . <break/>Knowledge of Islamic / Social Life SkillsKnowledge of social life and Islamic values are exceptionally critical for the instructors. As i and Islamic moral values bring worldwide and domestic/national peace, solidarity, and social alteration in society. The competent instructor is the one who continuously illustrates and practices social life skills throughout educating learners in the classroom. The information of Islamic values and social life abilities makes a difference. Educator must teach the Islamic code of conduct to instruct resistance, standards of Islamic philosophy within the texts books and to enhance the common values among learners. It moreover makes a difference to get it the social background of learners. With the assistance of these abilities, educators can successfully instruct and exchange information and abilities among learners in a superior way as stated by the   (Government of Pakistan, 2009).<break/>Standard 4: AssessmentThe instructor must assess student’s execution utilizing different procedures of evaluation. Instructors must decipher the outcome of that appraisal reasonably to enhance the learning of the learners. Evaluation strategies and prerequisites likely have a more prominent impact on how and what learners learn than any other figure. This impact might be of more prominent significance than the effect of instructing materials as explained by (Boud, 1992, p.39).Appraisal does more than distribute a review or degree classification to learners. It plays a major part in centering their consideration and, as Sainsbury &amp; Walker (2007) observe, really drives their learning. Gibbs (2003) states that appraisal has six fundamental capacities:•	Capturing learners  time and consideration•	Producing suitable  learning activities for learners•	Providing timely input which learners pay consideration•	Helping learners to internalize the discipline’s guidelines and ideas of uniformity•	Generating marks or grades which recognize between learners or empower pass/fail•	Decisions to be made for future learning.Giving prove for other outside the course to empower them to judge the suitability of guidelines on the course. Evaluation plays a number of parts in a student&apos;s life, a few of which they may be more mindful of than others. It is broadly acknowledged that students’ learning designs, instructive center, and assignment of time will be specifically impacted by evaluation.The Quality of instruction in any level cannot be realized without quality instructor. Instructors are the key figure of the instruction framework and without an energetic, committed and well qualified educator it will be troublesome to have bewildering advancement in instruction division. In this manner, it is the requirement of the moment that prepared and professionally competent educators be accepted within the framework. But, on the other hand instructor advancement cannot be carried out in confinement. Being the individuals of society, instructors have to be taken into thought a few commitments from their families, institutions, and community as well. In this manner, instructor preparation ought to be considered at the side the improvement of a conducive environment for scholastics, as well as to inquire about the advancement within the instruction, explained by  (Hammon &amp; Cobb, 1996). The proficient information of instructors is more often than not representative of their disposition.It implies that the teachers’  states of mind, behavior and set of values is subordinate on their professional information. As far as the nature of the teachers is concerned,  the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE, 2001)  states that “dispositions are the values, commitments, and proficient morals that impact behaviors towards learners, families, colleagues, and communities that influence learners in learning, inspiration, and advancement as well as the educator’s claim proficient growth”. Within the same way Taylor &amp; Wasicsko (2000) characterize it as the “personal qualities or characteristics that are had by people, counting states of mind, convictions, interface, values, modes of adjustments and appreciations”.
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2">
  <title>Objectives</title>
<p>The objectives of this study were to:</p><p>1.	Identify the levels of perceptions of Government secondary school teachers about National Professional Standards</p><p>2.	Identify the levels of perceptions of Government secondary school head teachers about National Professional Standards</p><p>3.	Find out the difference between male and female teachers and head teachers’ perceptions regarding NPSTs in terms of their demographic variables (age, experience, gender, qualification)</p><p><break/></p><p>Research Questions</p><p>The research questions of this study were:</p><p>1.	What are the levels of perceptions of Government secondary school teachers about National Professional Standards?</p><p>2.	What are the levels of perceptions of Government secondary school head teachers about National Professional Standards?</p><p>3.	What is the difference between male and female teachers and  head teachers’ perceptions regarding NPSTs in terms of their demographic variables (age, experience, gender, qualification)?</p><p><break/></p><p>Delimitation</p><p>Due to limited time and resources this study was delimited to 15 government secondary schools (for boys and girls) teachers and head teachers of district Lahore. The study was also delimited five National Professional Standards for Teachers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3">
  <title>Methodology</title>
<p>The nature of the study was quantitative. Population of this study was comprised of head teachers and teachers in the entire public sector secondary schools of Lahore district. At this time, there are 152 government boys’ secondary schools and 179 government girls’ secondary schools in Lahore in which 3544 male teachers and 5969 female teachers are working (School Education Department, 2017). At the first stage, since there were two strata (male and female secondary schools) in the population, so stratified random sampling technique was used to draw sample from each stratum. At the second stage, schools were selected using simple random sampling technique. At the third stage, principals and teachers was selected by using random sampling technique. Therefore, 30 principals (15 male and 15 female) and 300 teachers (150 male and 150 female) were selected.</p><p>In this study, two survey questionnaires were developed to collect data, first for the principals and the second for the teachers as per requirements of the study. These instruments contained closed-ended questions and open-ended questions. Closed-ended questions were developed at 5-Point Likert Scale ranging from ‘strongly agree (SA)’ to ‘strongly disagree (SDA).’ These tools were prepared by the researchers after reviewing the related literature. Demographic variables of first and second questionnaires were age, experience, gender and qualification. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques were applied to analyze the data. Mean and standard deviations were calculated in the descriptive statistical analysis to evaluate the exact averages of the subjects in accordance with their demographic representations. Whereas descriptive and inferential statistics were used to find  the comparison between teachers’ and principals’ perception and command over National Professional Standards. One-way ANOVA and independent sample t-test were used on demographic variables like; age, experience, gender, qualification etc.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-4">
  <title>Results</title>
<p><bold>RQ1:</bold> What are the levels of perceptions of secondary school
teachers and head teachers about NPST?</p><p><bold>Table 1. </bold>Comparison of Male and Female Teachers and Head
Teachers’ Perceptions about National Professional Standards at Secondary Level in
Terms of Gender</p><table-wrap id="table1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><title>Table 1</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Gender</bold></p> </td><td valign="top">  </td><td> <p><bold>Teachers’ Perception</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Head Teachers’ Perception</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Male</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Mean</p> <p>SD</p> <p>N</p> </td><td> <p>101.57</p> <p>7.75</p> <p>145</p> </td><td> <p>57.94</p> <p>9.11</p> <p>15</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Female</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Mean</p> <p>SD</p> <p>N</p> </td><td> <p>105.09</p> <p>7.38</p> <p>155</p> </td><td> <p>60.72</p> <p>57.94</p> <p>15</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Table 1 shows the mean scores and
standard deviation to compare the mean scores of perceptions of male and female
secondary school teachers and head teachers about national professional
standards in terms of gender. According to the mean scores, it is indicated
that mean scores of female teachers’ perception was higher (M=105.09, SD=
60.72) or advanced as compared to the mean scores (M= 101.57, SD= 57.94) of
male teachers’ perception regarding national professional standards at
secondary school level. Hence, it is concluded that female teachers emphasized
more on using national professional standards as compared to the male teachers.</p><p>In the case of head teachers, female head teachers’
perception is high as compared to the male head teachers’ perception regarding
NPSTs at secondary school level. Hence, it is concluded that female head
teachers emphasized more on using NPSTs as compared to the male head teachers.</p><p><bold>RQ2:</bold> What are the levels of perceptions of secondary school
teachers and head teachers about NPST?</p><p><bold>Table 2. </bold>Comparison between Male and Female Teachers and Head
Teachers’ Perceptions about National Professional Standards at Secondary Level in
Terms of Academic Qualification</p><table-wrap id="table2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><title>Table 2</title></caption><table><thead><tr><th valign="top"> <p><bold>Academic Qualification</bold></p> </th><th valign="top">  </th><th> <p><bold>Teachers’ Perception</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Head Teachers’ Perception</bold></p> </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p>B.A/B. Sc</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Mean</p> <p>SD</p> <p>N</p> </td><td> <p>102.80</p> <p>7.68</p> <p>143</p> </td><td> <p>59.87</p> <p>11.15</p> <p>16</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>M.A/M. Sc</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Mean</p> <p>SD</p> <p>N</p> </td><td> <p>103.77</p> <p>7.99</p> <p>123</p> </td><td> <p>57.36</p> <p>8.73</p> <p>11</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>M. Phil</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Mean</p> <p>SD</p> <p>N</p> </td><td> <p>104.32</p> <p>6.40</p> <p>25</p> </td><td> <p>59.00</p> <p>0.20</p> <p>1</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Ph. D.</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Mean</p> <p>Median</p> <p>N</p> </td><td> <p>105.00</p> <p>9.21</p> <p>9</p> </td><td> <p>60.50</p> <p>12.02</p> <p>2</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>This table 2 illustrates that the mean scores and standard
deviation to compare the perceptions of male and female secondary school
teachers and head teachers about national professional standards in terms of
their academic qualification. Mean scores indicated that teachers and head
teachers’ perception having qualification Ph. D have high mean scores
(M=105.00, SD= 60.50) as compared to the mean scores of teachers and head
teachers having qualification (BA/B. Sc, MA/M. Sc and M. Phil) regarding NPSTs
at secondary school level. Hence, it is concluded that teachers and head
teachers having qualification PhD emphasized more as compared to the teachers
and head teachers having qualification (BA/B. Sc., MA/M. Sc. and M. Phil)
regarding NPSTs at secondary school level.</p><p><bold>RQ3:</bold> What is the difference between male and female teachers and
head teachers’ perceptions regarding NPST in terms of gender?</p><p><bold>Table 3. </bold>Difference between Male and Female Teachers and Head
Teachers’ Perceptions about National Professional Standards at Secondary Level in Terms
of Gender</p><table-wrap id="table3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><title>Table 3</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Variables</bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Gender</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>N</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>M</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>SD</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>t</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>df</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Teachers’ Perception</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Male</p> <p>Female</p> </td><td> <p>145</p> <p>155</p> </td><td> <p>105.09</p> <p>101.57</p> </td><td> <p>7.38</p> <p>7.75</p> </td><td> <p>4.01</p> </td><td> <p>298</p> </td><td> <p>0.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Head Teachers’ Perception</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Male</p> <p>Female</p> </td><td> <p>15</p> <p>15</p> </td><td> <p>60.72</p> <p>57.94</p> </td><td> <p>11.27</p> <p>9.11</p> </td><td> <p>0.73</p> </td><td> <p>28</p> </td><td> <p>0.46</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Table 3 indicates that an independent
sample t-test was employed to compare the secondary school teachers and head
teachers mean scores for the male (M=105.09, SD=7.38) and female (M=101.57, SD=
7.75) teachers’ perception about National Professional Standards for Teachers
in terms of gender. There was significant mean difference existed between male
and female teachers’ perceptions about NPSTs at p?0.05 level of significance.
Hence, it was reflected that male and female teachers have different
perceptions about national professional standards at p?0.05 level of
significance.</p><p>As it is also shows that there was no significant mean
difference existed between male and female head teachers’ mean scores (M=
60.72, SD= 11. 27) of perception regarding NPSTs at p?0.05 level of
significance. Hence, it was reflected that no meaningful difference was found in
the perceptions of male and female head teachers about NPSTs.</p><p><bold>RQ4:</bold> What is the difference between male and female teachers and
head teachers’ perceptions regarding NPST in terms of their age?</p><p><bold>Table
4. </bold>Difference
between Male and Female Teachers and Head Teachers’ Perceptions about National
Professional Standards at Secondary Level in Terms of Age</p><table-wrap id="table4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><title>Table 4</title></caption><table><thead><tr><th valign="top"> <p><bold>Variables</bold></p> </th><th valign="top">  </th><th> <p><bold>df</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Sum of Square</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Mean Square</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Teachers’ Perception</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Between Group</p> <p>Within Group</p> <p>Total</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>294</p> <p>299</p> </td><td> <p>1000.40</p> <p>16971.18</p> <p>17971.58</p> </td><td> <p>200.08</p> <p>57.72</p> </td><td> <p>3.46</p> </td><td> <p>0.005</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Head Teachers’ Perception</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Between Group</p> <p>Within Group</p> <p>Total</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>24</p> <p>29</p> </td><td> <p>348.57</p> <p>2472.39</p> <p>2820.96</p> </td><td> <p>69.71</p> <p>103.01</p> </td><td> <p>0.67</p> </td><td> <p>0.645</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A one-way analysis of variance was
found between male and female teachers and head teachers’ perceptions about
national professional standards in terms of their age. This table shows that
there was statistically significant difference at p? 0.05 level of significance
between male and female teachers’ perception regarding national professional
standards in terms of their age. Hence, it was concluded that significant
difference was found in teachers’ perceptions about national professional
standards regarding their age groups.</p><p>In the case of head teachers there was
statistically no significant difference at p? 0.05 level of significance between
male and female head teachers’ perception regarding national professional
standards in terms of their age. Hence, it was concluded that no significant
difference was found in head teachers’ perceptions about national professional
standards regarding their age groups.</p><p><bold>RQ5:</bold> What is the difference between male and female teachers and
head teachers’ perceptions regarding NPST in terms of their experience?</p><p><bold>Table 5. </bold>Difference between Male and Female Teachers and Head
Teachers’ Perceptions about National Professional Standards at Secondary Level in
Terms of Experience</p><table-wrap id="table5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><title>Table 5</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Variables</bold></p> </td><td valign="top">  </td><td> <p><bold>Df</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sum of Square</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Mean Square</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Teachers’ Perception</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Between Group</p> <p>Within Group</p> <p>Total</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>294</p> <p>299</p> </td><td> <p>539.81</p> <p>17431.76</p> <p>17971.58</p> </td><td> <p>107.96</p> <p>59.29</p> </td><td> <p>1.82</p> </td><td> <p>0.109</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Head Teachers’ Perception</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Between Group</p> <p>Within Group</p> <p>Total</p> </td><td> <p>3</p> <p>26</p> <p>29</p> </td><td> <p>31.87</p> <p>2789.09</p> <p>2820.96</p> </td><td> <p>10.62</p> <p>107.27</p> </td><td> <p>0.09</p> </td><td> <p>0.960</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A one-way analysis of variance was
found between male and female teachers and head teachers’ perceptions about
national professional standards in terms of their experience. This table shows
that there was statistically no significant difference at p? 0.05 level of
significance between male and female teachers and head teachers’ perception
regarding national professional standards in terms of their experience. Hence,
it was concluded that no significant difference was found in teachers and head
teachers’ perceptions about national professional standards regarding their
experience.</p><p><bold>RQ6:</bold>
What is the difference between male and female teachers and head teachers’
perceptions regarding NPST in terms of their academic qualification?</p><p><bold>Table 6</bold>. Difference between Male and Female Teachers and
Head Teachers’ Perceptions about National Professional Standards at Secondary
Level in Terms of Academic Qualification</p><table-wrap id="table6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><title>Table 6</title></caption><table><thead><tr><th valign="top"> <p><bold>Variables</bold></p> </th><th valign="top">  </th><th valign="top"> <p><bold>Df</bold></p> </th><th valign="top"> <p><bold>Sum of Square</bold></p> </th><th valign="top"> <p><bold>Mean Square</bold></p> </th><th valign="top"> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </th><th valign="top"> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Teachers’ Perception</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Between Group</p> <p>Within Group</p> <p>Total</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>3</p> <p>296</p> <p>299</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>112.00</p> <p>17859.58</p> <p>17971.58</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>37.33</p> <p>60.33</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>0.61</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>0.603</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Head Teachers’ Perception</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Between Group</p> <p>Within Group</p> <p>Total</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>3</p> <p>26</p> <p>29</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>46.17</p> <p>2774.79</p> <p>2820.96</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>15.39</p> <p>106.72</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>0.14</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>0.932</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A one-way analysis of variance was
found between male and female teachers and head teachers’ perceptions about
national professional standards in terms of their academic qualification. This
table shows that there was statistically no significant difference at p? 0.05
level of significance between male and female teachers and head teachers’
perception regarding national professional standards in terms of their academic
qualification. Hence, it was concluded that no significant difference was found
in teachers and head teachers’ perceptions about national professional
standards regarding their academic qualification.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<p>The main objective of the study was to investigate the male and female teachers and teachers’ perceptions regarding National Professional Standards for Teachers at secondary school level of district Lahore. Findings of the study showed that there was significant mean difference found between male and female students’ perceptions about National Professional Standard for Teachers. These findings are congruent with the previous findings (Ball, 2000; Clements, 2001). As the researcher was able to analyze the result it was apparent that female teacher were more qualified and experienced, furthermore, they know about National Professional Standards and how to imply them in comparison to the teachers who had joined this profession in late 80s and 90s’. According to a research conducted by Shakir (2012) in his study “secondary school teachers’ competencies based on National Professional Teaching Standards&quot; 33.6% teachers were found at the level of developing teachers and 4.8% teachers were fully accomplished. NPST since then have emerged as the basic necessity for any teacher who wants to perform her job effectively and with quality.</p><p>As Peterson (2007) supported that &quot; there are many skills that children need in order to be successful in 21st century, the most important skills are; promote effective leadership, quality of teaching, ability to collaborate, critical thinking skills, oral presentation skills, written communication skills etc. and now after years of spreading awareness and the need to learn and follow NPST, this study  shows that may teachers are following the standards in order to create a better performance and effective teaching for their students.</p><p>In this study not only, the importance of the education system is discussed but how it is changing rapidly and massively too. NPST not only helps the teachers to improve their quality teaching but is defined as the development of professional and career cycle occurring as the teacher moves his/her professional career (Glatton 1995) explained the importance of the standards now in a teacher&apos;s lives. As the results show many teachers already know and are following NPST intentionally and unintentionally too.  Afshan and Huma (2013) stated that teacher training in Pakistan is passing through a transitional era; and the institutions that imparting educational training to the teachers are developing curriculum for a period of 4-5 years which can explain better results from many previous studies which concluded that many teachers in Pakistan does not know what National Professional Teaching Standards are. The results of this study shows that teachers who are more experienced, qualified and aged know what NPST are and how to imply them more than the teachers who have started their professional careers and are new to it. When a teacher trains to improve the quality of his/her performance, he/her also helps in improving the quality of the institute they work in and in the teaching profession as a whole too. Therefore, teacher training should be considered together with the development of conducive environment for academics, as well as research and development in the education (Hammon &amp; Cobb, 1996).</p><p>Male and female teachers have different perceptions about NPSTs. The results are supported by Shakir (2012) who concluded that male teachers were more active in practicing NPSTs as compared to the female teachers. According to the age level the young teachers are more aware of NPSTs as compared to the teachers who were inducted in 19s (Messo, 2010).</p><p>That there was statistically no significant difference at p? 0.05 level of significance between male, female teachers and head teachers’ perception regarding National Professional Standards for Teachers  in terms of their experience. The results are supported by (Ganser, 2000) who concluded quality of teaching practices can be improved with the help of informal experiences (such as reading journal articles related to quality of teaching and watching documentaries which are related to an academic discipline) and formal experiences (such as organizing and attending professional symposium, workshops and meetings, mentoring and team teaching).</p><p>There was statistically no significant difference at p? 0.05 level of significance between male and female teachers and head teachers’ perception regarding national professional standards in terms of their academic qualification. The study is supported by (Cochran, Smith &amp; Lytle, 2001; Walling &amp; Lewis, 2000) who said that with the passage of time, the quality of teaching practices of a teacher in classroom in the perspective of National Professional Standard for Teachers has been considered a long-term process that includes planned and mutual experiences of teachers and providing them regular opportunities to promote the quality teaching practices in classroom for the professional development of teachers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-6">
  <title>Conclusion and Recommendations</title>
<p>The researcher, with the help of descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques, was able to analyze the data collected from the teachers of government secondary school sector and the entire study reached this conclusion that many teachers intentionally or unintentionally knew about the National Professional Standards and they used them both in the classrooms and out of the classrooms in order to improve their processional teaching quality. Among newly hired teachers, females who are more qualified and experienced, than the hired teachers of the late 80’s and the 90’s, happened to know more about the standards. Newly inducted teachers followed the standards and had very clear concept of standards so they were found to be more enthusiastic about practicing these standards.</p><p>In the light of findings and conclusions, the following recommendations are given:</p><p>1.	Teacher training may not be limited to only the ethical rules. It should be relevant to each teacher’s subject and its practices.</p><p>2.	Every government school may organize monthly, if not weekly, in-service training programs for teachers to discuss their problems and concerns in the classroom.</p><p>3.	A meeting should be held outside of training programs to discuss the quality teaching and related problems with it.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group content-type="conflict-of-interest">
  <title>Conflict of Interest</title>
  <fn fn-type="conflict">
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="ethics-statement">
  <title>Ethics Statement</title>
  <fn fn-type="ethics">
<p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="data-availability">
  <title>Data Availability</title>
  <fn fn-type="data-availability-statement">
<p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<app-group>
  <app id="app-suppl">
    <title>Supplementary Materials</title>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://glrjournal.com/pdf/glr/zL6pxmHN2d.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  </app>
</app-group>
<ref-list>
  <title>References</title>
<ref id="Boud">
  <label>1</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Boud, D</person-group>
    <year>1992</year>
    <article-title>. The use of self-assessment schedules in negotiated learning</article-title>
    <source>Studies in Higher Education</source>
    <volume>17</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>185</fpage>
    <lpage>200</lpage>
    Boud, D. (1992). The use of self-assessment schedules in negotiated learning. Studies in Higher Education, 17(2), 185-200.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Buchmann">
  <label>2</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Buchmann, M</person-group>
    <year>1984</year>
    <article-title>. The use of research knowledge in teacher education and teaching</article-title>
    <source>American Journal of Education</source>
    <volume>92</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>421</fpage>
    <lpage>439</lpage>
    Buchmann, M. (1984). The use of research knowledge in teacher education and teaching. American Journal of Education, 92(4), 421-439.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="CochranSmith">
  <label>3</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Cochran-Smith, M., &amp; Lytle, S. L</person-group>
    <year>2001</year>
    <article-title>. Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice</article-title>
    <source>In Ann, L. &amp; Lynne, M. (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters. New York NY: Teacher College Press</source>
    <page-range>ractice</page-range>
    Cochran-Smith, M., &amp; Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In Ann, L. &amp; Lynne, M. (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters. New York NY: Teacher College Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="DarlingHammond">
  <label>4</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Darling-Hammond, L</person-group>
    <year>2008</year>
    <article-title>. Teacherlearning thatsupportsstudent learning</article-title>
    <source>Teaching forintelligence</source>
    <volume>2</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>91</fpage>
    <lpage>100</lpage>
    Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teacherlearning thatsupportsstudent learning. Teaching forintelligence, 2(1), 91-100.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Fielding">
  <label>6</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Fielding, G., &amp; Schalock, H</person-group>
    <year>1985</year>
    <article-title>. Promoting the professional development of teachers and administrators</article-title>
    <source>Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy and Management</source>
    <page-range>romoting</page-range>
    Fielding, G., &amp; Schalock, H. (1985). Promoting the professional development of teachers and administrators. Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy and Management.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Ganser">
  <label>7</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Ganser, T</person-group>
    <year>2000</year>
    <article-title>. Teams of two</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Staff Development</source>
    <volume>21</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>60</fpage>
    <lpage>63</lpage>
    Ganser, T. (2000). Teams of two. Journal of Staff Development, 21(1), 60-63
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Gibbs">
  <label>8</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Gibbs, J. C</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <article-title>. Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt</article-title>
    <source>Oxford University Press</source>
    <page-range>ress</page-range>
    Gibbs, J. C. (2013). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt. Oxford University Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Government">
  <label>9</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Government of Pakistan</person-group>
    <year>2009</year>
    <article-title>. National Professional Standards for Teachers in Pakistan</article-title>
    <source>Islamabad: Ministry of Education</source>
    <page-range>akistan</page-range>
    Government of Pakistan. (2009). National Professional Standards for Teachers in Pakistan. Islamabad: Ministry of Education.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Huma">
  <label>10</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Huma, A</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <article-title>. Adaptable program evaluation strategies for teacher education in Pakistan: A reflective paper written on the bases of literature review and document analysis</article-title>
    <source>International Journal of Humanities and Social Science</source>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <issue>7</issue>
    <fpage>42</fpage>
    <lpage>56</lpage>
    Huma, A. (2013). Adaptable program evaluation strategies for teacher education in Pakistan: A reflective paper written on the bases of literature review and document analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(7), 42-56.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Peters">
  <label>11</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Peters, M</person-group>
    <year>1981</year>
    <article-title>. Attentional asymmetries during concurrent bimanual performance</article-title>
    <source>The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</source>
    <volume>33</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>95</fpage>
    <lpage>103</lpage>
    Peters, M. (1981). Attentional asymmetries during concurrent bimanual performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(1), 95-103.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Sainsbury">
  <label>12</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Sainsbury, E. J., &amp; Walker, R</person-group>
    <year>2007</year>
    <article-title>. Same words, different meanings: Learning to talk the scientific language of pharmacy</article-title>
    <source>Sydney: Sydney University Press</source>
    <page-range>harmacy</page-range>
    Sainsbury, E. J., &amp; Walker, R. (2007). Same words, different meanings: Learning to talk the scientific language of pharmacy. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Taylor">
  <label>13</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Taylor, R. L., &amp; Wasicsko, M. M</person-group>
    <year>2000</year>
    <article-title>. The dispositions to teach</article-title>
    <source>In annual meeting of the Southern Region Association of Teacher Educators (SRATE) Conference, Eastern Kentucky university, Lexington, Kentucky KY (1-9 November, 2000)</source>
    Taylor, R. L., &amp; Wasicsko, M. M. (2000). The dispositions to teach. In annual meeting of the Southern Region Association of Teacher Educators (SRATE) Conference, Eastern Kentucky university, Lexington, Kentucky KY (1-9 November, 2000).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Walling">
  <label>14</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Walling, B., &amp; Lewis, M</person-group>
    <year>2000</year>
    <article-title>. Development of professional identity among professional development school preservice teachers: Longitudinal and comparative analysis</article-title>
    <source>Action in Teacher Education</source>
    <volume>22</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>65</fpage>
    Walling, B., &amp; Lewis, M. (2000). Development of professional identity among professional development school preservice teachers: Longitudinal and comparative analysis. Action in Teacher Education, 22(2), 65- 72.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Minhas">
  <label>15</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <article-title>Minhas, Z</article-title>
    <source>A. (2012, March 17). Teacher training: Activity and practice based teachereducation. The Dawn</source>
    <page-range>ractice</page-range>
    Minhas, Z. A. (2012, March 17). Teacher training: Activity and practice based teachereducation. The Dawn.
    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.dawn.com/news/703495/teacher-training-activity-and-practice-based-teachereducation.">http://www.dawn.com/news/703495/teacher-training-activity-and-practice-based-teachereducation.</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Shakir">
  <label>16</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Shakir, M</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    <article-title>. An evaluation of secondary school teachers&apos; competencies based on national professional standards in Punjab Province (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)</article-title>
    <source>The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan</source>
    <page-range>rofessional</page-range>
    Shakir, M. (2012). An evaluation of secondary school teachers&apos; competencies based on national professional standards in Punjab Province (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>