An interjection is a part of speech which is vital and decisive to communication as it helps us to convey emotions and transmit mindsets that are tough to describe with words alone. It is a term for a swift and abrupt pause in speaking, used to demonstrate feelings. They are used to express emotions like rage, disgust, surprise, happiness, excitement, enthusiasm etc. Interjections assist us by offering a rapid and efficient way to convey intricate and detailed emotional information. Without interjections, language would be complex, detailed and more explanatory because we would have to use elaborate sentences to make our emotions and attitudes explicit.

Keith Alan (2013) argues that interjections boost the fascination and meaning of language as they serve as spices, add flavour to it and make it appealing. Hills (2000) states that interjections have a specific function in communication. They are not conventional words, having their own existence outside of sentence structure but still being in action for indicating emotions. Cooke (2017) concludes that interjections frost the language with extra information and provide interest in the language. Gina Cooke believes that interjections are crucial as they make the language more appealing and interesting. To Wilkins (1992:119), "interjections have semantic, propositional or conceptual content…", they reflect complex conceptual structures through which communication is achieved. According to him, the meaning conveyed by interjections is in connection with the context in which it is used. They are short utterances that show feelings, emotions or reactions. They are not random but have proper meaning and reflect the speaker’s conceptual comprehension of the situation at hand. That’s why interjections are essential words in language that convey subtle aspects of meaning beyond the literal content of the words used.

Interjections are commonly used in daily life conversations, literature books, newspapers, and movies to make the language livelier, more expressive and appealing. It is essential to use interjections in conversation as they make it more natural. However, it is challenging to use interjections appropriately in speaking because getting its intended meaning can be difficult. Many scholars, authors and researchers have studied interjections but there is a lack of research on the morphology and pragmatics of interjections in Pashto and English languages. It is tough to use interjections effectively in Pashto and English and there is a need for research on the linguistic features of interjections in both languages. This research will be valuable as it will provide insights into how interjections can be used to enhance communication and make conversations more natural.

The study aims to answer these questions:

1. What are the characteristics of interjections in Pashto and English languages, both in terms of their form and their function in communication?

How do interjections in Pashto differ from English in terms of their morphological and pragmatic features?

It has become an important part of language to study interjections and its meaning. The importance of interjections in many languages has been studied by many researchers and many data on interjections have been reported. Interjections are studied in detail, and their phonological, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and cultural dimensions are examined.

“Interjections as Pragmatic Markers in English” by Elena Semino 2010; The author focuses on the role of interjections as discourse markers and explores the pragmatic functions of interjections in English discourse. By using corpus data and conversational analysis, the author has examined distinctive features of interjections.

“Interjections in English: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis” by Angela Downing 2010; The meanings of English interjections and their uses in context have been explored in this study by applying cognitive and pragmatic models. The study reports that interjections have multiple functions and serve a range of communicative purposes.

“Interjections Across Englishes: A Multidimensional Analysis “ by Joybrato Mukherjee and Anke Schulz 2007; A multidimensional analytical framework is used to investigate the cross-linguistic variation of interjections in six varieties of English. The authors describe several dimensions of distinctions in interjections, such as their degree of iconicity, frequency, intensity, and social and cultural connotations.

In "Interjections, Thematic Roles, and Thematic Structure" by Yael Greenberg 2006; The author claims interjections as not only messengers of emotions but also agents of predicate activeness. "Interjections" by Jan-Olaf Svantesson 2020, Anna Tsendina, Anastasia Karlsson, and Vivan Franzén; This book is about the forms, meanings and uses of interjections. The authors analyze interjections from different perspectives and provide a survey of interjections in various languages.

“Interjections, Language, and the ‘Show-and-Tell’ Nature of Human Communication” by Norbert Schmitt and Ramma El-Hassan 2020; This article reports that interjections take part in the "show-and-tell" nature of human interaction. Interjections have been claimed as devices that assist speakers in transmitting their feelings more strongly. The role of interjections in social interaction is described by the authors through the extraction of examples of interjections from English and other languages.

“Interjections: The Universal Yet Neglected Part of Speech” by Paul Tench 2012; This paper found interjections a crucial and essential part of speech but still largely neglected. The author argues about interjections from different perspectives.

According to Jane Austin's speech act theory, interjections are brief phrases that are used to express a variety of emotions, including surprise, admiration, delight, disgust, and approval. Interjections are categorized in a number of different ways. On the basis of meaning, there are emotive interjections, discourse markers, response particles and verbal gestures. Simple and complex interjections are classified on the basis of form. Based on functions, interjections are divided into three categories; expressional exclamations, conative interjections and phatic interjections by Ameka (1992).

John Searle has suggested that interjections can be classified as speech acts and their illocutionary impact can be better understood by the context in which they are used (Searle, 1975). Similarly to this, Catherine Emmott has inquired in what manner and for what reason or purpose interjections are used in speech (Emmott, 1997). For an utterance to be deemed successful, felicity conditions are the indispensable parameters. For interjections, felicity conditions are concerned with the social standards and practices around the usage of interjections in speech. According to the notion of appropriateness, language-situational implications must be fit and pertinent for the interaction between the speaker and the listener and for the social setting. Another favourable criterion for interjections is the rule of relevance. Interjections should not impede the conversation's subject and setting and should be apposite.

In accordance with Brown and Levinson's politeness theory, interjections can take part in the negotiation of face needs by showing empathy or appreciation for the hearer, or by minimizing the impact of an utterance. Interjections also have the tendency to mitigate the impact of face-threatening acts, which is a language that has the strength to impair or threaten the face, or social identity. Ochs (1990) and Locher (2010), conclude that interjections can be used as politeness strategies in interactions. The impact of a sensitive statement can be softened by interjections. Interjections act as performative verbs because they have a communicational purpose and execute an activity. For instance, the performative verb "I apologize" points to regret or remorse. It has been noted by Deborah Tannen that different cultures have distinctive norms about interrupting and interjecting communication (Tannen,1990). In some cultures, interrupting is thought to be rude, while in others, it is considered to be a sign of enthusiasm. The ways in which interjections are used in distinct contexts have been studied by linguists. Certain researchers (Schiffrin, 1987; Heritage and Raymond, 2005), claim that the feelings, emotions, attitudes, and intentions of speakers during dialogue can be indicated by interjections.

The study is schemed with a qualitative approach. Purposive sampling was utilized for selecting 40 participants who were proficient in both languages and had knowledge and experience with interjections. For data collection, a purposive observation method has been carried out which helped in observing natural conversations and interactions to capture the spontaneous use of interjections in various contexts. By this method, the target population's experiences, perceptions, and knowledge about interjections in both languages have been gathered. The gathered data was then categorized according to its morphological and pragmatic characteristics. The method of contrastive analysis is utilized to illustrate the parallels and discrepancies between Pashto and English interjections. By using a pragmatic framework, the study evaluates the use of language in a setting and the manner in which it is governed by a number of rules, theories, and approaches. This framework looked into how the interaction between linguistic components and the context-specific and social context of communication results in the construction of meaning.

The word formation of interjections and their properties are figured out in this section respectively.

Morphological features are concerned with the distinctive characteristics of a term's form, including its roots, prefixes, suffixes, and inflectional endings. Using these characteristics, words in various contexts or languages can be compared and contrasted. Improved comprehension of the way words are formed and used across different languages can be gained by the linguists through investigating these traits.

Morphological features which have been studied in this research are;

1. Reduplication is a linguistic process where a whole word or its part is repeated to intensify its meaning.

2. Repetition is a common linguistic device that is related to the act of repeating a word, phrase, sound, or other linguistic component.

3. Interjections as Holly Names are concerned with expletives which are phrases or sentiments derived from religious terms and employed to convey powerful feelings.

4. Loan words refer to those terms which are borrowed from one language and added into another language.

5. Onomatopoeia is the use of language whose sound imitates that which it names.

Similarities: Distinct forms of interjections in Pashto and English are similar in general. In terms of reduplication, it seems that the entire stem is repeated to intensify the feelings in both languages. As regards the proper names, both Pashto and English use the religious name "God" in varieties to express pity, disagreement, shock or anger. Both of the languages have rich vocabulary but have also borrowed some interjections as loan words from various languages. Pashto borrowed words from Urdu and English while English took advantage of Spanish, Italian, and Hebrew. Onomatopoeia is the contribution to the vocabulary of any language. Pashto and English show some kinds of imitative linguistic codification and represent a referent based on a diagrammatic sound-meaning identification. Hence, most onomatopoeia of interjections in Pashto and English tend to have a similar feature, the meanings of the words are denoted by the sounds.

Differences: Reduplication is used regularly in Pashto with word classes of verbs, nouns and interjections whereas it seldom occurs in English for particularity, intensification, or amusement and is mainly used in words that reflect sounds. Pashtoon people tend to use the proper name of “ALLAH” by Ya ALLAH, YA ALLAH toba, Ya ALLAH shukar, etc. Conversely, the proper name “Jesus” is replaced by “Jeez” and “God” is combined with another holly name “Holly” to form a moderate religious name of “Golly”. These euphemistic alternatives are used by individuals who wish to express themselves while being sensitive to religious beliefs or avoiding potentially offensive language.

Pragmatics refers to the branch of linguistics dealing with the language in use and the context in which it is used. The interjections may give different levels of emotion depending on a variety of accompanying words or expressions as well as the context to show advice, anger, agreement, compliments, disagreement, pain, pleading, sympathy, warnings and so forth under the purposes of the speaker. Although we use similar interjections, they express various intentions of the speaker.

Different purposes for which interjections are pragmatically used are;

1. Advice is guidance.

2. Anger is a strong feeling of annoyance, displeasure or hostility.

3. Delight refers to great pleasure.

4. A complaint is a statement that a situation is unsatisfactory or unacceptable.

5. Compliments are expressions of praise or admiration.

6. Hesitation is a pause before saying or doing something.

7. Confirmation concerns the correctness or verification that something is true.

8. Surprise is something unexpected.

9. Responses are answers or replies.

10. Refusals refer to denial and rejection.

11. Doubts mean feelings of uncertainty.

12. Sympathy is a feeling of pity or sorrow for the suffering of another.

13. Fears are unpleasant emotions caused by actual or perceived doing or threats.

14. Gratitude is thankfulness.

15. Pleading refers to the action of making an emotional or earnest appeal to someone.

16. Warnings are the indication of possible or impending dangers, problems, or other unpleasant situations.

17. Sarcasm concerns with the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.

Similarities: In terms of similarities of interjections in Pashto and English, a single interjection could carry out distinct pragmatic functions of surprise, anger, doubt and delight, refusals, compliments and so on. Both Pashto and English interjections are expressed to indicate the expressive and emotive feelings of the speakers to the addressees under the purpose of communication. Speakers of Pashto and English languages may use interjections by employing stance, gesture, and their entire body movement, far more than simply expressing verbal language.

Both Pashto and English interjections that are used in everyday speech present a combination of two or independent interjections.

Differences: As regards differences, it has been noted that the oftenness of English interjections is lower than in Pashto and the learners of English prefer less direct complaints than native speakers. We can see that most of interjections in English employ words such as “baby”, “Pa” or “my dear” as follows:

-Ooh baby, do not you know I suffer? My heart gets suffocated without you.

By contrast, there is only a combination of interjections without any direct addressing words. For example: Toba toba! (Meaning: Ta ba wai che da na da habar). Remarkably, English interjections such as "huh" or "eh" are employed to confirm the speaker’s assumption. In Pashto however, interjections "khaaa", "wai", "zaaaa" combine with other words such as "nu bya", "bya sa chal oshu", "us ba sa kigi" to form questions.

An abrupt pause, specially made to express strong feelings and reactions is called an interjection. They often have deficient grammatical associations with other items in a sentence. Morphologically, interjections can take various forms and have different origins. Pashto, an Indo-Iranian language which is largely spoken in Afghanistan and Pakistan, has its own unique collection of interjections. Due to historical and cultural interactions, Urdu has an impact on the formation of Pashto interjections. The borrowing from Urdu brings a distinct flavour to Pashto. In the case of English interjections, most of them are originally English words but borrowed words from other languages also make it more interesting and diverse.

Unlike other parts of speech, explicit propositional contents are not conveyed by interjections because their meaning and comprehension heavily rely on the context in which they are used. The listener would be dependent on procedural information to derive implicatures if an utterance consists solely of an interjection without an explicit proposition.