ARTICLE

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING THROUGH PEACE CURRICULUM AT GRADUATE LEVEL AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

09 Pages : 76 - 86

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).09      10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).09      Published : Mar 2020

English Language Learning through Peace Curriculum at Graduate Level An Experimental study

Abstract

    There is a dire need to develop English language proficiency among the students in comfortable environment especially in Pakistan Which would surely contriute in the personality development character and personality building It requires to search the role of an appropriate peace curriculum integrated with lesson plan Quantitative data collected through random sampling were analyzed via SPSS analysis tests The participants of this study were the students of graduate level and ESL Teachers Experimental and Controlled group had 20 students The controlled group was taught by the Traditional Lecture method While the participant of Experimental group were taught by the lesson plans designed with the integration of peace curriculum The proficiency skills of Writing and Speaking were enhanced due to the increase in the interest and motivation level of the student This study provides a helping hand to the parents and teacher to control the aggressive behavior of the students and teaching them peace and harmony

    ESL- Peace Curriculum, Traditional Lecture, Proficiency Skills

    (1) Abdul Khaliq
    Assistant professor, Department of Social and Allied Sciences, CUVAS Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Abdul Ghani
    Assistant professor, Department of Communication, Minhaj university Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Shehla Ilyas
    Subject specialist, Department of Educational Development, Quaid-e - Azam Academy for Educational Development, D.G Khan, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Ahmad, Z.S. (2017). Special Report on Peace Education in Pakistan. The United States Institute of Peace
  • Balasooriya, A. S. (2001). Learning the way of peace: A teachers' guide to peace education. New Delhi: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  • Barrs, J. (2005). Factors contributed by community organizations to the motivation of teachers in rural Punjab, Pakistan, and implications for the quality of teaching. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(3), 333-48
  • Bar-Tal (Eds). (1999). How Children Understand War and Peace: A Call for International Peace Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Bar-Tal, D. (2002). The elusive nature of peace education. Peace Education: The Concept, Principles, and Practices Around the World, 27-36.
  • Bar-Tal, D., & Rosen, Y. (2009). Peace education in societies involved in intractable conflicts: Direct and indirect models. In: Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 557-575.
  • Bashir Uddin, A., & Qayyum, R. (2014). Teachers of English in Pakistan: Profile and recommendations. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry, 12(1), 1-19.
  • Bayliss, D. D., & Raymond, P. M. (2004). The link between academic success andL2 proficiency in the context of two professional programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(1), 72-76.
  • Best, W.J., & Kahn, J. (1986). Research in Education (5th Edition). New Delhi, India: Prentice-Hall of India (Pvt.) Ltd.
  • Best, W.J., & Kahn, J. (2005). Research in Education. New Delhi, Prentice Hall.
  • Bragger, J. D. (1985). Materials development for the proficiency-oriented classroom. C. J. James (Ed.), Foreign language proficiency in the classroom and beyond (79-116). Lincolnwood: National Textbook Company
  • Clive, H., & Noriko, S. (2009). Schooling for violence and peace: how does peace education differ from 'normal' schooling?. Journal of Peace Education, 6, 2
  • Coleman, J. A. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39, 1- 14
  • Coleman, P. T. (2012). Constructive Conflict Resolution and Sustainable Peace. In P.T. Colemand and M. Deutsch (Eds) Psychological Components of Sustainable Peace. New York: Springer.
  • Costa, F., & Coleman, J. A. (2013). A survey of English-medium instruction in Italian higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(1), 3-19.
  • Friedrich, P (Ed.). (2012) Nonkilling Linguistics. Practical Applications (1st Edition). Honolulu: Center for Global Nonkilling. Retrieved from http://www.nonkilling.org.
  • Ghafoor, A. (1998). Promoting oral communication in a Pakistani (EFL)primary classroom (Unpublished master's thesis). The Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development, Karachi.
  • Glenn, S. (2018). Importance of Curriculum to Teaching. Synonym, Retrieved from 25 June 2018. https://classroom.synonym.com/importance-curriculum-teaching-6189570.html.
  • Gomes de Matos, F. (2007). Languages through Peace. A poem. New York: ACTFL, American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
  • Gomes de Matos, F. (2011). Communicative Dignity. A Checklist. Retrieved from www. humiliationstudies. org/ education/education/php.
  • Gomes, D.E., & Matos, F. (1993). Probing the communicative paradigm: a new concept for Sociolinguistics. Dublin, Ireland: International Sociological Association Sociolinguistics Newsletter
  • Gomes, D.E., & Matos, F. (1977). Linguísticahumana. VerbeteemPosfácioaoDicionário de Linguística e Gramática, J. MattosoCamara Jr. Petrópolis, EditoraVozes.
  • Gomes, D.E., & Matos, F. (1987). Peace as a new universal in language education. Tressaloniki University: Greek Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 191-205.
  • Gomes, D.E., & Matos, F. (2005). Peaceful language use: From principles to practices. Paris: UNESCO-EOLSS Online Encyclopedia.
  • Gomes, D.E., & Matos, F. (2009). Nonkilling and language usage Honolulu: Center for Global. Nonkilling. This is a section on the site www.nonkilling.org/node/182.
  • Gomes, D.E., & Matos, F. (2009). Posters on The right to peace, Educating all children for Nonkilling. The day weapons refused to kill, ABCs of Peace for children, Communicative Dignity: A Checklist, Prerequisites to a sustainable world peace, TESOLers as appliers of Nonkilling
  • Gomes, D.E., & Matos, F. (2010). Learning to communicate peacefully. In Online Encyclopedia of Peace Education, edited by Monisha Bajaj. New York, Teachers College, Columbia University
  • Gomes, D.E., & Matos, F. (2012). LIF PLUS: the life-improving force of peaceful language use. In P.T. Coleman and M. Deutsch (Eds). The Psychological Components of Sustainable Peace. New York: Springer Publications
  • Goode, W.J., & Hatt, P.K. (1968). Methods in Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill Publications.
  • Huseyinhaci, A.S., Derviskayimbasioglu, Z.A., Gazi, F.A., Aksal, M.C.K. (2016). Computer Education & Instructional Technology Department, Faculty of Education, Near East University. Engineering Faculty, Near East University: Learning English language in peace context through technology.
  • James, C.J. (1985). Learning from proficiency: the unifying principle. In C. J. James (Ed.), Foreign language proficiency in the classroom and beyond (pp. 1 -8). Lincolnwood: National Textbook Company.
  • Johnson, E. (1961). The Research Report: A Guide for the Beginner. New York: Ronald Press.
  • Kerlinger, F.N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research (2nd Edition). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Wilson.
  • Lederach, J.P. (1997). Building peace: sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press
  • Mahboob, A. (2009). English as an Islamic language: A Case Study of Pakistani English. World Englishes, 28(2), 175-189.
  • Nagarajan, S. (2006). The place of world English's in composition: Pluralization continued. College Composition and Communication, 57(4), 586-619.
  • Nordquist, R. (2018). English Language: History, Definition, and Examples. Thought Co, Jun. 27, 2018, thoughtco.com/what-is-the-english-language-1690652.
  • Nurlu, M. (2015). EMI in Turkish universities. Modern English Teacher, 24(2), 12-14.
  • Oplatka, I. (2007). The context and profile of teachers in developing countries in the last decade: A revealing discussion for further investigation. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(6), 476- 490.
  • Punamäki, R.L. (1999). Concept Formation of War and Peace: Between Child Development and a Politically Violent Society. In: A Raviv, L Oppenheimer.
  • Salomon, G. (2004). Does peace education make a difference in the context of an intractable conflict?. Peace and Conflict, 10(3), 257-274.
  • Salomon, G., 2002. Peace education: The Concept, Principles and Practices Around the World. Mahwah, NJ. LEA.
  • Shamim, F. (2008). Trends, issues and challenges in English language education in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3), 235-249.
  • Stephen, D. F., Welman, J. C., & An, W. J. J. (2004). English language proficiencyan indicator of academic performance at a tertiary institution. Journal of Human Resource Management, 2(3), 42-53.
  • Tickoo, M.L. (2006) Language in Education. World Englishes, 25(1), 167-176.
  • United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). (1999). Peace Education in UNICEF. New York: UNICEF Programme Publications.
  • Watson, M. K. (2015). From rural street theater to big city extravaganza: The meaningof the Manaus boiBumbá in an urbanizing Brazil. The University of New Mexico.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Khaliq, A., Ghani, A., & Ilyas, S. (2020). English Language Learning through Peace Curriculum at Graduate Level An Experimental study. Global Language Review, V(I), 76 - 86. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).09

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Khaliq, Abdul, Abdul Ghani, and Shehla Ilyas. 2020. "English Language Learning through Peace Curriculum at Graduate Level An Experimental study." Global Language Review, V (I): 76 - 86 doi: 10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).09

HARVARD

    HARVARD : KHALIQ, A., GHANI, A. & ILYAS, S. 2020. English Language Learning through Peace Curriculum at Graduate Level An Experimental study. Global Language Review, V, 76 - 86.

MHRA

    MHRA : Khaliq, Abdul, Abdul Ghani, and Shehla Ilyas. 2020. "English Language Learning through Peace Curriculum at Graduate Level An Experimental study." Global Language Review, V: 76 - 86

MLA

    MLA : Khaliq, Abdul, Abdul Ghani, and Shehla Ilyas. "English Language Learning through Peace Curriculum at Graduate Level An Experimental study." Global Language Review, V.I (2020): 76 - 86 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Khaliq, Abdul, Ghani, Abdul, and Ilyas, Shehla (2020), "English Language Learning through Peace Curriculum at Graduate Level An Experimental study", Global Language Review, V (I), 76 - 86

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Khaliq, Abdul, Abdul Ghani, and Shehla Ilyas. "English Language Learning through Peace Curriculum at Graduate Level An Experimental study." Global Language Review V, no. I (2020): 76 - 86. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).09