ARTICLE

PARANOIA OF LOSS AN ECOCRITICAL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL INJUSTICE AGAINST NATIVE AMERICANS IN SILKOS CEREMONY

16 Pages : 146-152

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).16      10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).16      Published : Mar 2020

Paranoia of Loss: An Ecocritical Study of Environmental Injustice against Native Americans in Silko's Ceremony

    The paper analyzes Leslie Marmon Silkos’ Ceremony (1977) from Buell's theoretical perspective of eco-cosmopolitanism. In Native American worldview, nature holds a special place. The Natives not only identify themselves with nature but also have a life sharing bond of interdependence with it. European colonization displaced Native Americans from their homeland. Their natural resources have been mercilessly exploited since contact resulting in fatal diseases and poverty. The colonial exploitation of nature reached its climax during the WWII. The colonial insensitivity to the environment renders them callously indifferent to non-human life. The earth as a source of life is sacred for American Indians but it was commodified by Euro-Americans who dug up uranium mines for war which destroyed human habitat. The findings of the study reveal that European colonizers wreaked havoc in the Native Americans' life by destroying their environment and mental peace.

    World War II, Nature, Mental Trauma, European Colonization, Native American Literature
    (1) Sardar Ahmad Farooq
    Lecturer, Department of English, Government Postgraduate College, Mansehra, Kp, Paksitan.
    (2) Sahar Javed
    Lecturer, Department of English, Government College University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Ghulam Murtaza
    Associate Professor, Department of English, Government College University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Adamson, J. (1958). American Indian literature, environmental justice, and ecocriticism: The middle place. Tuscon, United States: University of Arizona Press.
  • Adamson, J., & Ruffin, K. N. (2013). American studies, ecocriticism, and citizenship: Thinking and acting in the local and global commons. New York: Routledge.
  • Adamson, J., Evans, M. M., & Stein, R. (Eds.). (2002). The environmental justice reader: Politics, poetics and pedagogy. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Ames, C. B. (Summer 2006). Rhetorics of resistance and revelation: Reading Daly, Woolf and Silko as ecofeminist literature. MA thesis, California State University, San Marcos.
  • Berry, W. (2002). A continuous harmony: Essays cultural and agricultural. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.
  • Bewell, A. (1999). Romanticism and colonial disease. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press
  • Boyd, D. (1994). Mad bear. Touchstone Books, Simon & Schuster: New York.
  • Buell, L. (2005). The future of environmental criticism: Environmental crisis and literary imagination. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Bullard, R. D. (2005). The quest for environmental justice: Human rights and the politics of pollution. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
  • Byrd, J. A. (2011). The transit of empire: Indigenous critiques of colonialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Churchill, W. (1998). Struggle for the land: Native North American resistance to genocide, ecocide and colonization. San Francisco, California: City Lights
  • Griffin, G. (1988). Research methods for English studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Howe, L., Gordon, R. (1999). Seventh generation: An anthology of Native American plays. Blue Lake: Theatre Communication Group.
  • Huggan, G., & Tiffin, H. (2010). Postcolonial ecocriticism: Literature, environment and animals. London and New York: Routledge
  • Johansen, B. E., & Pritzker, B. M. (2008). Encyclopedia of American Indian history. Santa Barbra, California: ABC-CLIO.
  • Lewis, D. R. (1994). Neither wolf nor dog: American Indians, environment, and agrarian change. Oxford University Press.
  • McAvoy, L. (2002). American Indians, Place Meanings and the Old/New West. Journal of Leisure Research. 34 (6), 383-392.
  • Momaday, N. S. (1968). House made of dawn. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Neihardt, J. G. (2000). Black elk speaks. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Silko, L. M. (1992). Almanac of the dead. New York: Penguin.
  • Silko, L. M. (1977). Ceremony. New York: Penguin.
  • Stoll, M., & Adam M. S. (2014). United States west coast: An environmental history. Santa Barbra, California: BC-CLIO.
  • Waldman, C. (2006). Encyclopedia of Native American tribes. Third Edition. New York: Facts on File.

Cite this article

    APA : Farooq, S. A., Javed, S., & Murtaza, G. (2020). Paranoia of Loss: An Ecocritical Study of Environmental Injustice against Native Americans in Silko's Ceremony. Global Language Review, V(I), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).16
    CHICAGO : Farooq, Sardar Ahmad, Sahar Javed, and Ghulam Murtaza. 2020. "Paranoia of Loss: An Ecocritical Study of Environmental Injustice against Native Americans in Silko's Ceremony." Global Language Review, V (I): 146-152 doi: 10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).16
    HARVARD : FAROOQ, S. A., JAVED, S. & MURTAZA, G. 2020. Paranoia of Loss: An Ecocritical Study of Environmental Injustice against Native Americans in Silko's Ceremony. Global Language Review, V, 146-152.
    MHRA : Farooq, Sardar Ahmad, Sahar Javed, and Ghulam Murtaza. 2020. "Paranoia of Loss: An Ecocritical Study of Environmental Injustice against Native Americans in Silko's Ceremony." Global Language Review, V: 146-152
    MLA : Farooq, Sardar Ahmad, Sahar Javed, and Ghulam Murtaza. "Paranoia of Loss: An Ecocritical Study of Environmental Injustice against Native Americans in Silko's Ceremony." Global Language Review, V.I (2020): 146-152 Print.
    OXFORD : Farooq, Sardar Ahmad, Javed, Sahar, and Murtaza, Ghulam (2020), "Paranoia of Loss: An Ecocritical Study of Environmental Injustice against Native Americans in Silko's Ceremony", Global Language Review, V (I), 146-152
    TURABIAN : Farooq, Sardar Ahmad, Sahar Javed, and Ghulam Murtaza. "Paranoia of Loss: An Ecocritical Study of Environmental Injustice against Native Americans in Silko's Ceremony." Global Language Review V, no. I (2020): 146-152. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).16