An Evaluation of Elementary Level (Grade 1) English Textbook with Reference to SNC Framework
Poetry The present study aims at evaluating the Elementary level (Grade 1) English Textbook of Punjab Curriculum and Textbook Board Lahore in the light of the ideological, psychological and social foundations of the curriculum and the objectives stated of the said class in SNC 2020. The evaluation was done through document analysis and a rubric developed by the researchers themselves. The objective was to do the evaluation of contents of the prescribed book, its layout and design, and its alignment with the ideological, social, and psychological foundations and SLOs of grade 1 mentioned in the SNC document. The aim is to ascertain whether the textbook remained true to its learning outcomes and competencies mentioned in the Curriculum document by the Ministry of Education. The findings confirm that the book met most of the criteria set in the curriculum documents.Still, there are a few shortcomings for which the researchers have suggested certain recommendations.
-
Text-book Evaluation, SNC Document, Elementary Level
-
(1) Sufia Azad
PhD Scholar, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education, Islamabad, Pakistan.
(2) Nighat Bashir
PhD Scholar, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education, Islamabad, Pakistan.
- Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.1.5
- Assad, A. (2010). Evaluation of ELT course book step ahead1. A master’s thesis Fatima Jinnah Woman University, Pakistan.
- Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy (2 nd ed.). New York.
- Cunningsworth, A. (1988). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. Heinemann.
- Grainger, D. (2002). Textbook selection for ESL classrooms. (Report No. EDO-FL- 02-10).
- Hsu, Y.-p. F. (2010). Evaluating a Set of Junior High School English Text-books with Criteria Developed on the Basis of CLT Principles. College of Applied Languages, Ming Chuang University.
- Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., & Xin, Y. P. (2010). An Evaluation of the Intended and Implemented Curricula’s Adherence to the NCTM Standards on the Mathematics Achievement of Third Grade Students: A Case Study. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 4(2), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2010.v4n2p 33-50.
- Karamzin, F. M. (2014). A Post-Use Evaluation of Pakistani Secondary School English Textbook. TESOL International Journal, 9(1), 15-37.
- Khan, H. A. (2007). A Need Analysis of Pakistani State Boarding Schools Secondary Level Students Adoption of Communicative Language Teaching. Middlesex University.
- Ladnier-Hicks, J., McNeese, R. M., & Johnson, J. T. (2010). Third Grade Reading Performance and Teacher Perceptions of the Scott Foresman Reading Street Program in Title I Schools in South Mobile County. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 4(2), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2010.v4n2p 51-70
- Lamia, J. (1999). Making the Textbook More Communicative. The Internal TESL Journal, 5(1). http://iteslj.org/Articles/LamieTextboo ks.html
- Linn, R. L., & Ground, N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8 ed.). Upper Saddle River: NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
- Lutz, D. R. A. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: a South Korean case study. Asian EFL Journal. http://www.asian-eK- journal.com/Litz_thesis.pdf
- Madsen, H. S., & J Donald Bowen. (1978). Adaptation in language teaching. Newbury House.
- Mahmood, K, Iqbal, et al (2009). Textbook evaluation through quality indicators: The case of Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 31 (2), 1-27.
- Mahmood, K. (2006). The process of textbook approval: A critical analysis. Bulletin of Education & Research, 28(1), 1-22. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/ier/pr evious_pdf/1- Paper_textbooks%5B%5D.pdf
- Marsh, C. (2004). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum (3 rd ed.). Routledge Falmer: London and New York.
- McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Munby, J. (1978). Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nemati, A. (2009). Evaluation of an ESL English Course Book: A Step towards Systematic Vocabulary Evaluation. Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2009.1 1892726
- Nichols, B., Shitake, S., Johnson, G., & Singer, K. (2006). Managing Curriculum and Assessment. A practitioner’s Guide. Lin worth Books: Ohio.
- Nunan, D. (1988). The Learner Centered Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- O’Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.2.104.
- Ornstein, A., & Hankins, F. (1998). Curriculum: Foundations. Principle and issues. Chapter 10: Curriculum implementation. Boston: MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Piaget, J. (1957). Construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Rahman, T. (2005). Passports to privilege: The English-medium schools in Pakistan. Peace and Democracy in South Asia, 1(1), 24-44.
- Rahman, T. (2009). Language ideology, identity and the commodification of language in the call centers of Pakistan. Language in Society, 38(02), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404509090 344.
- Rizvi, M. (2008). The Role of School Principals in Enhancing Teacher Professionalism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/174114320708406 2.
- Rizvi, S. A. A. (2011). A comparative study of English language curriculum of Secondary School Certificate (SSC) and General Certificate of Education Ordinary Level (GCE O-Level) in Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research 3(1), 310-316.
- Salvia, J., Seedlike, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2007). Assessment (10 ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Ganga, & M. Scriven,
- Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum Development. Macmillan.
- Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- UNESCO. (1998). UNESCO statistical yearbook Paris: UNESCO.
- Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37(3), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/37.3.251.
Cite this article
-
APA : Azad, S., & Bashir, N. (2022). An Evaluation of Elementary Level (Grade 1) English Textbook with Reference to SNC Framework. Global Language Review, VII(II), 382-394. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2022(VII-II).32
-
CHICAGO : Azad, Sufia, and Nighat Bashir. 2022. "An Evaluation of Elementary Level (Grade 1) English Textbook with Reference to SNC Framework." Global Language Review, VII (II): 382-394 doi: 10.31703/glr.2022(VII-II).32
-
HARVARD : AZAD, S. & BASHIR, N. 2022. An Evaluation of Elementary Level (Grade 1) English Textbook with Reference to SNC Framework. Global Language Review, VII, 382-394.
-
MHRA : Azad, Sufia, and Nighat Bashir. 2022. "An Evaluation of Elementary Level (Grade 1) English Textbook with Reference to SNC Framework." Global Language Review, VII: 382-394
-
MLA : Azad, Sufia, and Nighat Bashir. "An Evaluation of Elementary Level (Grade 1) English Textbook with Reference to SNC Framework." Global Language Review, VII.II (2022): 382-394 Print.
-
OXFORD : Azad, Sufia and Bashir, Nighat (2022), "An Evaluation of Elementary Level (Grade 1) English Textbook with Reference to SNC Framework", Global Language Review, VII (II), 382-394
-
TURABIAN : Azad, Sufia, and Nighat Bashir. "An Evaluation of Elementary Level (Grade 1) English Textbook with Reference to SNC Framework." Global Language Review VII, no. II (2022): 382-394. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2022(VII-II).32