ARTICLE

HEDGING AS AN INDICATOR OF DISCIPLINARY VARIATION IN PAKISTANI ACADEMIC DISCOURSE A CORPUS BASED STUDY

06 Pages : 46-56

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).06      10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).06      Published : Mar 2020

Hedging as an Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Pakistani Academic Discourse: A Corpus Based Study

    Hedging is a pragmatic phenomenon which is practiced to signal interpersonal communication. In academic discourse, hedges are used to signal writers’ presence in a text. This article explores the use of hedges particularly with reference to epistemic and deontic modality markers—important and frequently used types of hedges-- in Pakistani research dissertations belonging to three major disciplines: Sciences, Social Sciences and Humanities. The material is based on a special purpose corpus of Pakistani academic writing developed with 235 M.phil and PhD research theses. To find out the frequencies of modal verbs AntConc 3.5.6 was used. All the frequencies were listed and every 50th example was analysed using the theoretical distinction between epistemic and deontic modality outlined by Biber et al. (1999). Statistical analysis of the data reveals, that disciplinary affiliation has a considerable influence on the proportion of epistemic and deontic modality

    Hedging, Epistemic and deontic modality, Disciplinary variation, Pakistani Academic Writing
    (1) Musarrat Azher
    Lecturer, Department of English, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Riffat un Nisa Awan
    Associate Professor, Department of Education, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Sana Nawaz
    Lecturer, Department of English, University of Mianwali, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Anthony, L. (2012). AntConc (3.5.6w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.laurenceanthony.net
  • Azher, M., & Mehmood, A. (2016). Exploring new discourses of Pakistani academic writing: A Multidimensional Analysis. Science international, 28(4), 245-254
  • Azher, M., & Mehmood, A. (2016). Exploring Linguistic Variation across Pakistani Academic Writing: AMultidimensional Analysis, Journal of Critical Inquiry, 14(2), 6-113
  • Azher, M., & Mehmood, A. (2016). Comparing Linguistic Features of Academic Discourse in Pakistani and British English, Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 284-309
  • Azher, M., & Mehmood, A. (2018). Linguistic Variation across Research Sections of Pakistan Academic Writing: A Multidimensional Analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics 8 (1) 284-309
  • Bao, Z. (2010). Must in Singapore English. Lingua, 120 (7)
  • Berkenkotter, C. & T. Huckin (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Longman.
  • Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre. London: Longman
  • Chen, H. (2010). Contrastive learner corpus analysis of epistemic modality and interlanguage pragmatic competence in L2 writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching .
  • Coates, J. (1995). The expression of root and epistemic possibility in English. In B. Aarts, & C. Meyer (Eds.), The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description (pp. 145-156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • DeCarrico, J. (1986). Tense, aspect and time in the English modality system. TESOL Quarterly
  • Fischer-Starcke, B. (2010). Corpus linguistics in literary analysis: Jane Austin and her contemporaries. Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Grabe, W. & R. B. Kaplan (1997).
  • Meyer, P. G. (1997).
  • Mukundan, J., & Khojasteh, L. (2011). Modal Auxiliary Verbs in Prescribed Malaysian English Textbooks. English Language Teaching.
  • Nkemleke, D. A. (2005). Must and Should in Cameroon English1. Nordic Journal of African Studies.
  • Nwogu, K. N. (1990). Discourse variation in medical texts. Nottingham: University of Nottingham
  • Nwogu, K. N. (1997).
  • Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Piqué, J. & J.-V. Andreu-Besó (1998).
  • Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S. Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
  • Rozumko, A. (2017) Adverbial markers of epistemic modality across Disciplinary discourses: a contrastive study of Research articles in six academic disciplines. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52(1), doi: 10.1515/stap-2017-0004
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1998).
  • Varttala, T. (1999) Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes (18)2, 177-200.
  • Varttala, T. (2001) Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse. Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Electronic doctoral dissertation. Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 138 http://acta.uta.fi/pdf/951-44-5195-3.pdf
  • Vine, B. (2004). Modal verbs in New Zealand English directives. Nordic journal of English studies. (18)7, 145- 167

Cite this article

    APA : Azher, M., Awan, R. u. N., & Nawaz, S. (2020). Hedging as an Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Pakistani Academic Discourse: A Corpus Based Study. Global Language Review, V(I), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).06
    CHICAGO : Azher, Musarrat, Riffat un Nisa Awan, and Sana Nawaz. 2020. "Hedging as an Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Pakistani Academic Discourse: A Corpus Based Study." Global Language Review, V (I): 46-56 doi: 10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).06
    HARVARD : AZHER, M., AWAN, R. U. N. & NAWAZ, S. 2020. Hedging as an Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Pakistani Academic Discourse: A Corpus Based Study. Global Language Review, V, 46-56.
    MHRA : Azher, Musarrat, Riffat un Nisa Awan, and Sana Nawaz. 2020. "Hedging as an Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Pakistani Academic Discourse: A Corpus Based Study." Global Language Review, V: 46-56
    MLA : Azher, Musarrat, Riffat un Nisa Awan, and Sana Nawaz. "Hedging as an Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Pakistani Academic Discourse: A Corpus Based Study." Global Language Review, V.I (2020): 46-56 Print.
    OXFORD : Azher, Musarrat, Awan, Riffat un Nisa, and Nawaz, Sana (2020), "Hedging as an Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Pakistani Academic Discourse: A Corpus Based Study", Global Language Review, V (I), 46-56
    TURABIAN : Azher, Musarrat, Riffat un Nisa Awan, and Sana Nawaz. "Hedging as an Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Pakistani Academic Discourse: A Corpus Based Study." Global Language Review V, no. I (2020): 46-56. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-I).06