References

• Anthony, L. (2012). AntConc (3.5.6w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from
• Azher, M., & Mehmood, A. (2016). Exploring new discourses of Pakistani academic writing: A Multidimensional Analysis. Science international, 28(4), 245-254
• Azher, M., & Mehmood, A. (2016). Exploring Linguistic Variation across Pakistani Academic Writing: AMultidimensional Analysis, Journal of Critical Inquiry, 14(2), 6-113
• Azher, M., & Mehmood, A. (2016). Comparing Linguistic Features of Academic Discourse in Pakistani and British English, Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 284-309
• Azher, M., & Mehmood, A. (2018). Linguistic Variation across Research Sections of Pakistan Academic Writing: A Multidimensional Analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics 8 (1) 284-309
• Bao, Z. (2010). Must in Singapore English. Lingua, 120 (7)
• Berkenkotter, C. & T. Huckin (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Longman.
• Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre. London: Longman
• Chen, H. (2010). Contrastive learner corpus analysis of epistemic modality and interlanguage pragmatic competence in L2 writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching .
• Coates, J. (1995). The expression of root and epistemic possibility in English. In B. Aarts, & C. Meyer (Eds.), The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description (pp. 145-156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• DeCarrico, J. (1986). Tense, aspect and time in the English modality system. TESOL Quarterly
• Fischer-Starcke, B. (2010). Corpus linguistics in literary analysis: Jane Austin and her contemporaries. Continuum International Publishing Group.
• Grabe, W. & R. B. Kaplan (1997).
• Meyer, P. G. (1997).
• Mukundan, J., & Khojasteh, L. (2011). Modal Auxiliary Verbs in Prescribed Malaysian English Textbooks. English Language Teaching.
• Nkemleke, D. A. (2005). Must and Should in Cameroon English1. Nordic Journal of African Studies.
• Nwogu, K. N. (1990). Discourse variation in medical texts. Nottingham: University of Nottingham
• Nwogu, K. N. (1997).
• Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Piqué, J. & J.-V. Andreu-Besó (1998).
• Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S. Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
• Rozumko, A. (2017) Adverbial markers of epistemic modality across Disciplinary discourses: a contrastive study of Research articles in six academic disciplines. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52(1), doi: 10.1515/stap-2017-0004
• Salager-Meyer, F. (1998).
• Varttala, T. (1999) Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes (18)2, 177-200.
• Varttala, T. (2001) Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse. Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Electronic doctoral dissertation. Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 138
• Vine, B. (2004). Modal verbs in New Zealand English directives. Nordic journal of English studies. (18)7, 145- 167