References

• Adjei, S. B. (2013). Discourse analysis: Examining language use in context. Qualitative Report, 18(25).
• Atkins, A. (2002). Critical discourse analysis: A letter to expatriates from the Rt. Hon. Sir Norman Fowler MP. Jan 2002(January), 1-20.
• Baron, J. B. (2006). Law, Literature, and the Problems of Interdisciplinarity. The Yale Law Journal, 108(5), 1059.
• Breeze, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics, 21(4), 493-525.
• Carlson, K., Livermore, M. A., & Rockmore, D. (2018). A Quantitative Analysis of Writing Style on the U.S. Supreme Court. SSRN Electronic Journal, 93(6)
• Celicourt, K., & Cris, M. A. (1999). The relationship between law and literature - in search of justice and justification.
• Dijk, T. A. Van, & Kintsch, W. (1983). Teun A van Dijk & Walter Kintsch - Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. 389.
• Elms, E. (2008). On the Use of Classical Allusions in Judgment Writing. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 31(1), 56.
• Farah Constructions Pty Ltd., v. Say-Dee Pty Ltd., (2007 HCA 22, 230 CLR 89)
• Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (2006). Discourse and Social Change. In Contemporary Sociology 22,
• Forsyth, N. (2009). Introduction: From Imitation to Intertextuality. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1.
• Fox, N. J. (2014). Intertextuality and the writing of social research INTERTEXTUALITY AND THE WRITING OF SOCIAL University of Sheffield Medical School Beech Hill Road. (January 1995).
• Frey, L., Botan, C., & Kreps, G. (1999). Chapter 9: Textual Analysis. Investigating Communication: An Introduction to Research Methods, 5 pages.
• Gadbin-George, G. (2013). To quote or not to quote:
• Haig, E. (n.d.). Notes for Norman Fairclough's Analysing Discourse. Media Discourse, 1 (Version 4), 1-7.
• Harwood, C. (2007). Franz Kafka's Literature and Law. (Laws 524)
• Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, (AIR 2011 SC 1637)
• Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi v. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, PLD 2017 SC 692
• Jedi or Judge: How the Human Mind Redefines Judicial Opinions. (2016). Wyoming Law Review, 16(2), 325- 342.
• Klinck, D. R. (1986).
• Liu, W., & Liu, S. (2008). Illocutionary and Perlocutionary Acts in Chinese Judge's Attached Discourse. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 3(1), 137-144.
• Majors take Limited v. Curtis, (2008) 1 AC 787
• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
• Mishra, R. K. (2012). A study of intertextuality : The way of reading and writing. Prime Research Education (PRE), 2(3), 208-212
• Mst. Aasia Bibi v. The State, (Criminal Appeal No.39-L 2018)
• Muhammad Azhar Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan, PLD 2012 SC 774
• Nwadike, C. (2018). Intertextuality and Spirotextuality : Rethinking Textual Interconnections. (September).
• Pakistan Electrical and Mechanical Contractor Ltd. v. Chairman National Industries Relations, Commission, (1984 PLC(CS) 325)
• Posner, R. A. (2006a). Judges' Writing Styles (And Do They Matter?). The University of Chicago Law Review, 62(4), 1421.
• Sabir, M., & Kanwal, N. (2018). Norman Fairclough ' s model as a research tool in the critical discourse analysis of Robert Frost ' s poem Fire and Ice. 1(1), 83-99.
• Sajjad Ali Shah v. Asad Ali, (1999 SCMR 640)
• Strachey v. Ramage, EWCA Civ 804 (2008)
• The Director of Public Prosecutions, Gauteng v. Oscar Leonard Carl Pistorius, (2017) ZASCA 158
• Thompson, N. (2012). Follow the Reader : Literature' s Influence on the Law and Legal Actors. (October)
• Timothy, T., West, P., & Purdue, I. (2008). Marko Juvan : History and Poetics of Intertextuality
• United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974)
• Zhang, M. (2014). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Political News Reports. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(11), 2273-2277.