References
- Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 409-431.
- Cohen, V. B. (1985). A re-examination of feedback in computer-based instruction: Implication for instructional design. Educational Technology, 25(1), 33-37.
- Corpuz, V. F. (2011). Error correction in second language writing: teachers' beliefs, practices and students' preferences. Masters by Research thesis, Queensland University of Technology
- Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple-Draft Composition Classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33.
- Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland and F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2014). Teaching L2 Composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd). New York: Routledge.
- Ghazal, L., Gul, R., Hanzala, M., Jessop, T., & Tharani, A. (2014). Graduate Students' Perceptions of Written Feedback at a Private University in Pakistan. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2).
- Goldstein, L. M. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 63-80.
- Gul, M., & Rodrigues, S. (2012). Unveiling the Focus of a Teacher's Written Feedback on Students' Composition Writing in Pakistan. International Research Journal, 1(3), 59- 66
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of eedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
- HEDGCOCK, J., & LEFKOWITZ, N. (1996). Some Input on Input: Two Analyses of Student Response to Expert Feedback in L2 Writing. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 287-308.
- Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185- 212.
- Hyland, K., & Anan, E. (2006). Teachers' perceptions of error: The effects of first language and experience. System, 34(4), 509- 519.
- Iqbal, S., Gul, R., Lakhani, A., & Rizvi, N. F. (2014). Teachers' Accounts of Their Perceptions and Practices of Providing Written Feedback to Nursing Students on Their Assignments. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(3).
- Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., & Smith, B. (2004) Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. York: UK. Higher Education Academy, 140, 1-40.
- Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In. B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 57-68.
- Lewis, M. (2002). Giving feedback in language classes. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre
- Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of error feedback in second language writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, 15, 65-79
- Mohebbi, H. (2013). Written corrective feedback in L2 pedagogy: Claims and counter-claims, recent finding, and future research directions. International Journal of Innovative Ideas, 13(2), 29-36.
- Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
- Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501-517.
- Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: the students' perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143-154.
- Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
- Shine, E. A. (2008). Written feedback in a freshman-writing course in the UAE: Instructors' and students' perspectives on giving, getting and using feedback. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massey University, Palmerstone North, New Zealand.
- Straub, R. (2000). The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response. Assessing Writing, 7(1), 23-55.
Cite this article
-
APA : Khan, S. H., Ishaq, Q., & Shah, S. H. (2021). Perceptions and Practices of Written Feedback in English Classes at Intermediate level in Bagh, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Global Language Review, VI(II), 201 - 213. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(VI-II).22
-
CHICAGO : Khan, Shoukat Hayat, Qudsia Ishaq, and Sabir Hussain Shah. 2021. "Perceptions and Practices of Written Feedback in English Classes at Intermediate level in Bagh, Azad Jammu and Kashmir." Global Language Review, VI (II): 201 - 213 doi: 10.31703/glr.2021(VI-II).22
-
HARVARD : KHAN, S. H., ISHAQ, Q. & SHAH, S. H. 2021. Perceptions and Practices of Written Feedback in English Classes at Intermediate level in Bagh, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Global Language Review, VI, 201 - 213.
-
MHRA : Khan, Shoukat Hayat, Qudsia Ishaq, and Sabir Hussain Shah. 2021. "Perceptions and Practices of Written Feedback in English Classes at Intermediate level in Bagh, Azad Jammu and Kashmir." Global Language Review, VI: 201 - 213
-
MLA : Khan, Shoukat Hayat, Qudsia Ishaq, and Sabir Hussain Shah. "Perceptions and Practices of Written Feedback in English Classes at Intermediate level in Bagh, Azad Jammu and Kashmir." Global Language Review, VI.II (2021): 201 - 213 Print.
-
OXFORD : Khan, Shoukat Hayat, Ishaq, Qudsia, and Shah, Sabir Hussain (2021), "Perceptions and Practices of Written Feedback in English Classes at Intermediate level in Bagh, Azad Jammu and Kashmir", Global Language Review, VI (II), 201 - 213
-
TURABIAN : Khan, Shoukat Hayat, Qudsia Ishaq, and Sabir Hussain Shah. "Perceptions and Practices of Written Feedback in English Classes at Intermediate level in Bagh, Azad Jammu and Kashmir." Global Language Review VI, no. II (2021): 201 - 213. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(VI-II).22