References

• Alley, M. (1987). The Craft of Scientific Writing. New York: Springer.
• Atkinson, D. (1998). Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the royal society of London, 1675-1975. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
• Benesch, H. (2008). Buildings, change, futurity – reading Seattle public library and Sendai mediateque. Proceedings of Design Inquiries, May. (27-30). Sweden: Stockholm.
• Booth, V. (1985). Communication in science: Writing and speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bruffee, K. (1986). Social construction: Language and the authority of knowledge. A bibliographical essay. College English, 48(8), 773-779.
• Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Clyne, M. (1988). Cross-cultural responses to academic discourse patterns. Folia Linguistica, 22(4), 455--475.
• Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional discourse. In W. Nash (Eds.), The writing scholar: Studies in the language and conventions of academic discourse (118-136). Newbury Park: Sage Publication.
• Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807–1825.
• Drury, J. (2001). Extending usability inspection evaluation techniques for synchronous collaborative computing applications. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts. Lowell.
• Falahati, R. (2004). A contrastive study of hedging in English and Farsi academic discourse. (Master’s Thesis, University of Victoria).
• Fryer, D. L. (2012). Analysis of the generic discourse features of the English language medical research article: A systemic-functional approach . Functions of Language, 19 (1), 5-37.
• Fulmiler, S. (2002). Introduction: Genre analysis and world Englishes. New York: Arnold.
• etkham, K. (2011). Hedging devices in applied linguistics research articles. Interdisciplinary Discourses in Language and Communication, 141-154.
• Gilbert, G. N., & Muikay, M. (1984). Opening the pandora box: A sociological analysis of scientific discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hedge, M. N. (1994). A coursebook on scientific and professional writing in speech language pathology. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
• Hinkel, E. (2005). Hedging, inflating and persuading in L2 academic writing. Applied Language Learning, 14, 29–54.
• Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese- medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2795-2809.
• Hubler, A. (1983). Understatements and hedges in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Hyland, K. (1995). The Author in the text: Hedging scientific writing. Hong Kong papers in linguistics and language teaching, 18, 33-42.
• Hyland, K. (1996). Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433-454.
• Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles (Vol. 54). John Benjamins Publishing.
• Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written communication, 18(4), 549-574.
• Irvin, L. (2010). What is “academic” writing?. In C. Lowe, & P. Zemliansky (Eds.), Writing spaces: Reading and writing (03- 17). NJ: Parlor Press.
• Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 458-508.
• Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P., & Lafuente-Millán, E. (2010). Introduction. In R. LorésSanz, P. Mur-Dueñas, & E. Lafuente-Millán (Eds.), Constructing Interpersonality (2- 10). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Markkanen, R. & Schroder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen, & H. Schroder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (3-18). Berlid New York: Walter de Gruyter.
• Musa, A. (2014). Hedging in academic writing: A pragmatic analysis of English and Chemistry masters’ theses in a Ghanaian university. English for Specific Purposes, 42(15), 1-26. Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1- 35.
• Myers, G. (1996). Public understanding of science and forms of popularizations. In E. Ventola, & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing today and tomorrow, (33-44). Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
• Nasiri, S. (2012). Utilization of hedging devices by American and Iranian researchers in the field of civil engineering. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 124-133.
• Nguyen Thi Thuy, T. (2018). A corpus-based study on cross-cultural divergence in the use of hedges in academic research articles written by Vietnamese and native English-speaking authors. Social Sciences, 7(4),
• Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
• Salager-Meyer, F. (1991). A genre-based and text- type analysis of hedging in written medical English discourse (1980-1990). Interface, 6, 33- 54.
• Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149-170.
• Vande, K. W. J. & Crismore, A. (1990). Readers' reactions to hedges in a science textbook. Linguistics and Education, 2, 303-322.
• Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 83--102.
• Varttala, T. (1999). Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for specific purposes, 18(2), 177-200
• Varttala, T. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse. Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Tampere University Press.
• Wishnoff, J. R. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners’ acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies, 19(1), 119-148.
• Yang, Y. (2013). Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese scientific discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 23-36.
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353
• Zemach, D. E., & Rumisek, L. A. (2005). Academic writing from paragraph to essay. Oxford: Macmillan.
• Zuck, J. G., & Zuck, L. V. (1986). Hedging in newswriting. In A.M. Cornu, J. Van Parjis, M. Delahaye & L. Baten (Eds), Beads or bracelets? How do we approach LSP, Selected papers from the Jifth European symposium on LSP (172-1 80). Oxford: OUP.